![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0034.png)
FOR EXPERT REVIEW PANEL USE ONLY
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
2
Method Safety Concerns:
Safety hazards are addressed.
Pros/Strengths:
•
Cons/Weaknesses
•
Supporting Data
•
General Comment:
-
Method Optimization:
•
Performance Characteristics
-
Does the method meet the SMPR for the following:
Analytical Range:
LOQ:
Copper:
near low conc. Limit (0.001), the RSDr were 11.07% (0.0014 mg/100g) 5.35% (0.0087),
3.87% (0.0066), 9.19% (0.0025); This is larger the SMPR for RSDr (5%); Their RSDR were
133%
, 11.78%,
7.1%, and 15.55%, the SMRP for RSDR is 16% for these levels;
Iron:
near low conc. Limit (0.01): the RSDr were 8.59% (0.0173 mg/100g), 3.18% (0.0282), 2.94%
(0.0465); the RSDR were
25.96%,
7.56%, 7.58%;
Manganese:
low conc limit (0.001): the RSDr and the RSDR were excellent.
HorRat values:
32% in RSDR at 0.001 mg/100g; 22% at 0.01 mg/100g
.