Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  12 / 79 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 79 Next Page
Page Background

6th ICHNO

page 13

6

th

ICHNO Conference

International Conference on innovative approaches in Head and Neck Oncology

16 – 18 March 2017

Barcelona, Spain

__________________________________________________________________________________________

7

AO Alessandria, Oncologia, Alessandria, Italy

8

INT Milano, Oncology, Milano, Italy

9

AO città della Salute Torino, Oncology, Torino, Italy

10

ASL3 genova, Oncology, Genova, Italy

11

ASO Santa Croce e Carle, Oncologia Ufficio Trials,

CUNEO, Italy

12

ASO Santa Croce e Carle, Oncology, Cuneo, Italy

Purpose/Objective

On January 2010 We started a randomized multicenter

phase III study comparing chemoradiation (Aldestein RTOG

regimen) (CRT) versus induction chemotherapy followed

by bioradiation (RT +Cetuximab). The main objective of

the trial is Overall Survival and secondary end points are

Response Rate (RR), Progression Free survival (PFS) role of

Biomolecular prognostic factors (EGFR,HPV) and Toxicities

Material/Methods

Naïve patients with locally advanced head and neck

squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), histological proven, of

the oral cavity larynx hypopharynx oropharynx stage III or

IV are eligible. Additional requirement for enrolment

included adequate bone marrow function, renal function,

hepatic function and age higher than 18 yr old.

Treatment consisted of: Arm A Taxotere 75 mg/mq and

Cisplatin 75 mg/mq day 1, 5FU c.i. 750mg/mq 96h, every

3 weeks for 3 times and Cetuximab loading dose 400

mg/mq followed by weekly 250mg/mq with a standard

Radiotherapy program equivalent daily dose 2Gy up to 70

Gy; Arm B Cisplatin 100 mg/mq day 1,22,43 concurrent

with

the

same

RT

scheduling.

Statistic: 278 pts twill be accrued. Primary end-point is

OS; secondary end-points include PFS, LRC, Complete

response rate, toxicity and metastasis free survival.

Results

276/278 pts were enrolled up to now. Accrual will be

stopped on December 2016 and the final analyses will be

provided

by

April

2018.

Preliminary toxicity data on 170 pts previously presented

(ESMO 2015) were as follows: (85 and 85 on Arm A and B).

M/F were 70/15 and 66/19 in Arm A and B respectively.

Toxicities are reported as the worst grade observed during

the treatment. Haematological toxicities G3 + G4 in Arm

A and B were: leukopenia 8 and 6; neutropenia: 18 and 7;

anaemia: 2 and 3 ; thrombocytopenia were 0 and 1

respectively in arm A and arm B. Stomatitis G3/4 were

28/4 and 23/1. Weight loss G1/2/3 weight loss was

25/10/2 and 25/ 12/2 in arm A and in Arm B respectively.

Radio-dermatitis G 3/4 was 14/1 and 3/0 in Arm A and B.

Dysphagia G2/3 was reported in 16/11 and 10/15 patients

at first post treatment clinical evaluation. 2 patients (1 in

Arm A and 1 in Arm B) developed Renal toxicity.

Final results on patients’ population and toxicity will be

presented at the ICHNO meeting.

Conclusion

The study will finish accrual in few weeks. Data from

comparison of these two arms will be presented.

OC-020 Sarcopenia predicts chemotherapy dose-

limiting toxicity in patients with head and neck cancer

S.I. Bril

1

, A.W. Wendrich

2

, J.E. Swartz

2

, I. Wegner

2

, A. De

Graeff

3

, E.J. Smid

4

, R. De Bree

1

, A.J. Pothen

1

1

UMC Utrecht, Head and Neck Surgical Oncology,

Utrecht, The Netherlands

2

UMC Utrecht, Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck

Surgery, Utrecht, The Netherlands

3

UMC Utrecht, Medical Oncology, Utrecht, The

Netherlands

4

UMC Utrecht, Radiotherapy, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

Low skeletal muscle mass or sarcopenia is emerging as an

adverse prognostic factor for chemotherapy dose limiting

toxicity (CLDT) and overall survival (OS) in cancer

patients. In contrast to other cancers, sarcopenia has not

yet been researched as a prognostic factor in head and

neck cancer. We recently published a novel method for

accurate and easy measurement of skeletal muscle mass

in head and neck cancer patients. Using this method, we

aimed to determine the prognostic impact of sarcopenia

on CDLT and OS in patients with locally advanced head and

neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) treated with

primary radiochemotherapy (RCT).

Material and Methods

All patients diagnosed with LA-HNSCC and treated with

primary RCT between January 2007 and December 2011 in

the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands,

were included in this study. Clinical variables were

retrospectively retrieved. Skeletal muscle mass was

measured at the level of the third cervical vertebra (C3)

using pre-therapy CT scans and controlled for height

(cm

2

/m

2

). A cut-off point for sarcopenia was determined

using optimum stratification. We performed multivariate

analysis to determine prognostic factors for CDLT and OS.

Results

112 patients were included in this study. 34 (30.4%)

experienced CDLT. The optimal cut-off value for defining

sarcopenia as a predictor of CDLT was ≤43.2 cm2/m2.

Using this cut-off, 61 patients were sarcopenic (54.5%).

Sarcopenic patients experienced significantly more CDLT

than non-sarcopenic patients (44.3% versus 13.7%, p <

0.000). In multivariate analysis, an increase in skeletal

muscle mass was associated with lower odds of CDLT (OR

0.93, 95% CI: 0.88–0.98). OS did not differ significantly

between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic (45.1 versus 49.0

months, p = 0.189). Patients who experienced CDLT had a

significantly lower OS than patients who did not (36.6

versus 54.2 months, p = 0.038).

Conclusion

Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of CDLT in LA-

HNSCC patients treated with primary RCT. OS did not

differ significantly between sarcopenic and non-

sarcopenic patients, but patients with CDLT had a

significantly lower OS. Pre-therapeutic assessment of

skeletal muscle mass can help identifying patients at risk

of CDLT. In the future, routine skeletal muscle mass

assessment may allow for personalized cancer care

regarding optimal chemotherapy dose and early

supportive

care

interventions.