Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  133 / 374 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 133 / 374 Next Page
Page Background

DRINKS,

133

resolved

itself

into

a

committee

on

Feb.

23,

Sir

Joseph

Jekyll

moved

the

following

resolutions

:

(i)

That

the

low

price

of

spirituous

liquors

is

the

principal

induce-

ment

to

the

excessive

and

pernicious

use

thereof.

(2)

That

a

discouragement

should

be

given

to

their

use

by

a

duty.

(3)

That

the

vending,

etc.,

of

such

liquors

be

restrained

to

persons

keeping

public

brandy-

shops,

victualling

houses,

coffee

houses,

ale

houses

and

inn-holders,

and

to

such

apothecaries

and

surgeons

as

should

make

use

of

the

same

by

way

of

medicine

only

;

and,

(4)

That

no

person

keeping

a

public

brandy-shop,

etc.,

should

be

permitted

to

vend,

etc.,

such

liquors,

but

by

licence

with

duty

payable

thereon.

These

Resolutions

were

agreed

on

without

debate.

On

March

8,

Mr.

William

Pulteney

affixed

a

duty

of

205.

per

gallon

on

gin,

on

the

grounds

of

ancient

use

and

sanction,

and

of

its

reducing

many

thousands

of

families

at

once

to

a

state

of

despair.

Sir

Robert

Walpole

had

no

immediate

concern

in

the

laying

of

this

tax

on

spirituous

liquors,

but

suffered

therefrom

much

unmerited

obloquy.

The

bill

was

presented

by

Jekyll

from

a

spirit

of

philanthropy,

which

led

him

to

contemplate

with

horror

the

progress

of

vice that

marked

the

popular

attachment

to

this

inflammatory

poison.

The

populace

showed

their

disapprobation

of

this

Act

in

their

usual

fashion

of

riot

and

violence.

We

are

told

in

Coxe's

Walpole

that

numerous

desperados

continued

the

clandestine

sale

of

gin

in

defiance

of

every

restriction.

The

duty

of

205-.

per

gallon

was

repealed

16

Geo.

II.,

c.

8.

On

the

28th

of

September,

1736,

it

was

deemed