b.
Resources can be identified by theAOACStatisticsCommittee.
E.
Reproducibility/Uncertainty andProbability ofDetection
a.
For quantitativemethods, data demonstratingReproducibility&Uncertaintymust be
present. Experimental designs to collect this datamay varywith themethod protocol,
available laboratories, and the intended use of themethod (i.e., collaborative studies,
proficiency testing, etc.).
b.
For qualitativemethods, datamust be present demonstrating the probability of detection
at specified concentration levels as defined by the SMPR. Experimental designs to
collect this datamay varywith themethod protocol, available laboratories, and the
intended use of themethod.
c.
Guidance and support canbe obtained from theAOACStatisticsCommittee.
F.
Comparison toSMPR
a.
Documentmethod performance versus SMPR criteria. NotewhichSMPR criteria are
met. For SMPR criteria notmet, theERP documents the reasoningwhy themethod is
still acceptable.
b.
Data is present to assure thematrix and analyte scopes are covered. This is critical for
methods used for dispute resolutions.
G.
FeedbackFromUsers ofMethod
a.
Document positive and negative feedback fromusers of themethod during the trial
period.
b.
Feedback fromusers demonstratingmethod ruggedness should be documented.
c.
Assess the future availability of vital equipment, referencematerials, and supplies.
H.
ERPRecommendations toRepeal First ActionMethods
a.
Recommendations to repeal First Actionmethods shall be accompaniedwith detailed
reasons for the decision.
Effectiveas of February 1, 2012
