2014 ERP New Member Book - page 44

©2012AOAC INTERNATIONAL
G
UIDELINES
FOR
S
TANDARD
M
ETHOD
P
ERFORMANCE
R
EQUIREMENTS
AOACO
FFICIAL
M
ETHODS
OF
A
NALYSIS
(2012)
Appendix F, p. 8
Table A3. Recommendations for evaluation
Bias (if a referencematerial is available)
Aminimum of five replicate analyses of aCertifiedReferenceMaterial.
a
Environmental interference
Analyze test portions containing a specified concentration of one environmental materials panel
member. Materialsmay bepooled. Consult withAOAC statistician.
Exclusivity/cross-reactivity
Analyze one test portion containing a specified concentration of one exclusivity panel member.
More replicates can be used. Consult withAOAC statistician.
Inclusivity/selectivity
Analyze one test portion containing a specified concentration of one inclusivity panel member.
More replicates can be used. Consult withAOAC statistician.
Limit of quantitation (LOQ)
Estimate the LOQ= average (blank) +10
s
0
(blank). Measure blank sampleswith analyte
at theestimated LOQ. Calculate themean average and standarddeviation of the results.
Guidance
b
: ForML≥ 100 ppm (0.1mg/kg): LOD=ML
1/5. ForML< 100 ppm (0.1mg/kg):
LOD=ML
2/5.
Measurement uncertainty
Use ISO 21748:
Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility, and trueness estimates
in measurement uncertainty estimation to analyze data collected for bias, repeatability, and
intermediate precision to estimatemeasurement uncertainty
.
POD(0)
Usedata from collaborative study.
POD (c)
Repeatability
Prepare and homogenize three unknown samples at different concentrations to represent the
full, claimed range of themethod.Analyze each unknown sample by the candidatemethod
seven times, beginning each analysis fromweighing out the test portion through to final result
withno additional replication (unless stated to do so in themethod).All of the analyses for one
unknown sample should be performedwithinas short a period of time as is allowed by the
method. The second and third unknownsmay be analyzed in another short time period. Repeat
for each claimedmatrix.
Probability of detection (POD)
Determine the desiredPOD at a critical concentration. Consult withTableA7 to determine the
number of test portions required to demonstrate the desiredPOD.
Probability of identification (POI)
Consult
Probability of Identification (POI): AStatistical Model for theValidation of Qualitative
Botanical IdentificationMethods
c
.
Recovery
Determined from spiked blanks or sampleswith at least seven independent analyses per
concentration level at aminimum of three concentration levels covering the analytical range.
Independent means at least at different times. If no confirmed (natural) blank is available, the
average inherent (naturally containing) level of the analyte should be determined on at least
seven independent replicates.
Marginal % recovery = (C
f
–C
u
)
100/C
A
Total % recovery = 100(C
f
)/(C
u
+C
A
)
whereC
f
= concentration of fortified samples, C
u
= concentration of unfortified samples, andC
A
= concentration of analyte added to the test sample.
d
Usually total recovery is usedunless the nativeanalyte is present in amounts greater than about
10% of theamount added, inwhich case use themethod of addition.
e
Reproducibility
(collaborativeor interlaboratory study)
Quantitativemethods: Recruit 10–12 collaborators; must have eight valid data sets; two
blind duplicate replicates at five concentrations for each analyte/matrix combination to each
collaborator.
Qualitativemethods: Recruit 12–15 collaborators; must have 10 valid data sets; six replicates at
five concentrations for each analyte/matrix combination to each collaborator.
a
Guidance for Industry for Bioanalytical MethodValidation
(May 2001) U.S. Department of HealthandHumanServices, U.S. Food andDrugAdministration,
Center for DrugEvaluation andResearch (CDER), Center for VeterinaryMedicine (CVM).
b
CodexAlimentariusCodexProcedureManual.
c
LaBudde, R.A., &Harnly, J.M. (2012)
J. AOAC Int
.
95
, 273–285.
d
Guidelines for CollaborativeStudyProcedures toValidateCharacteristics of aMethodof Analysis
(2012)
Official Methods of Analysis
, 19thEd.,
AppendixD,
AOAC INTERNATIONAL, Gaithersburg, MD.
e
AOACGuidelines for Single-LaboratoryValidation of Chemical Methods for DietarySupplements andBotanicals
(2012)
Official Methods of Analysis
, 19thEd.,
AppendixK
,AOAC INTERNATIONAL, Gaithersburg, MD.
1...,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43 45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,...58
Powered by FlippingBook