Previous Page  105 / 240 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 105 / 240 Next Page
Page Background

Data Analysis

Data was managed and analyzed with SPSS 17 for Windows

(IBM Corp, Armonk, New York). Descriptive statistics were

used to summarize demographic characteristics and the risks

and benefits mentioned and recalled. Nonparametric tests

(results were not normally distributed)—including Wilcoxon

signed ranks, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney

U

tests—

were used depending on how many independent groups were

included in the analyses to assess differences in recall across

the various identified predictors. Sample size was assessed

through analysis with the independent variable consisting of

the most groups (ie, the most stringent of the analyses

conducted)—specifically, 3 degrees of freedom, power of

0.95,

a

set at 0.05, and a medium estimated effect size of

0.5 indicated that the sample required at least 69 participants.

Results

Participants

Over a 1-year period, 131 parents were enrolled in this

study, of whom 42 did not complete the follow-up interview

and 5 video recordings were unable to be coded due to tech-

nical problems. This resulted in a final sample of 84 partici-

pants. No significant differences were found in any of the

demographic factors between those who completed the

study and those who did not complete the study.

The majority of participants were mothers (81.0%)

between the ages of 19 and 44 years (mean

6

SD, 33.23

6

5.07); fathers (19.0%) were between 19 and 51 years old

(35.25

6

5.91). The mean age of children was 33.56

6

15.20 months (range, 9-60), and about half (59.5%) were

boys. Most parents were married (70.2%) and Caucasian

(89.3%). Seventeen (20.2%) participant children had under-

gone surgery, and 13 (15.5%) parents reported that other chil-

dren in the family had previous surgery. Of the 84 families,

26 (31.0%) had 2 parents present at the consultation visit. A

summary of the demographic details is presented in

Table 1

.

Three fellowship-trained pediatric otolaryngologists, who

ranged in age from 37 to 47 years, conducted the consulta-

tion appointments. Two were men, 1 was a woman, and all

were in a salaried academic practice. All 3 completed their

otolaryngology–head and neck surgery residency in Canada,

with fellowship training in the United States (n = 2) and

Australia (n = 1). Medical trainees were present in 33 video

recordings (39.3%), and 1 of 2 female nurses was involved

in 49 (58%) visits.

Risks and Benefits Mentioned

The specific benefits and risks mentioned during the consul-

tation and those recalled by the participants for adenotonsil-

lectomy and tympanostomy tube insertion are shown in

Tables 2 and 3

. The rare benefits and risks documented in

the literature (eg, death from bleeding) but not mentioned

during the consultations are not included in the tables.

Across all procedures, the most common benefits of sur-

gery mentioned were the reduced number of infections

(otitis media or tonsillitis, 37%) and the reduced number of

oral antibiotics required postsurgery (18%). Specific to ade-

notonsillectomy, better breathing (21%) and improved sleep

(18%) were most commonly mentioned by the surgeons.

Most common risks mentioned during the consultation were

risk of general anesthesia (42%) and readmission (36%).

For adeno/tonsillectomy, bleeding/hemorrhage (43%) and

discomfort/pain (39%) were most commonly mentioned.

Risk and Benefits Recalled

The most commonly recalled benefits were reduced

infections (32%) and better breathing (19%). The most com-

monly recalled risks were risk of general anesthesia (20%)

and bleeding/hemorrhage (31%). Specific to tympanostomy

Table 2.

Risks and Benefits Mentioned and Recalled Associated

with Adenotonsillectomy.

Mentioned

during

Consultation

Mentioned

at 2-wk

Follow-up

Interview

Benefits of surgery

Better breathing

18

16

Growth spurt

6

5

Improve attention issues

a

1

1

Improved cognitive/learning

a

1

0

Fewer colds

1

0

Reduced nasal discharge/secretion

b

4

2

Improved eating/appetite

c

2

6

Reduced apneas

a

2

1

Improved sleep

15

9

Improved daytime energy

a

1

0

Reduced number of infections

a

31

27

Reduced number of oral antibiotics

a

15

2

Reduced days of daycare/school/

work missed

a

1

0

Improved speech/voice

a,c

1

2

Improved quality of life

a

7

7

Prevents long term comorbidities

a

1

0

Risks of surgery

General anesthesia

35

17

Bleeding/hemorrhage

36

26

Bad breath

14

1

Discomfort/pain

33

2

Vomiting/nausea

a

5

0

Fever

6

0

Time off from school and activities

18

5

Regrowth of adenoids over time

b

4

1

Dehydration

17

0

Reduce oral intake

a

9

0

Readmission

a

30

11

Need for blood transfusion

a

14

0

a

Tonsillectomy only.

b

Adenoidectomy only.

c

Gray shading indicates that risk or benefit was mentioned by more parents

than those who were told in the consultation visit about it.

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 155(2)

83