![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0271.png)
•
In all comparisons, only global health status was found to be
significantly worse on univariable cox proportional hazard
modeling for surgical patients when compared to SABR (HR
0.19, p=0.038).
•
SF-HLQ analysis: lower
total productivity cost
to society for
SABR compared to surgery. The mean total productivity cost for
SABR was €95
and
€3,513 for surgery
(p=0.044).
•
Patients reported a lower total degree of hindrance in paid and
unpaid work for SABR compared to surgery (mean hindrance
scores for SABR: 1.9, for surgery: 6.0, p=0.010).
PRO’s analyses in ROSEL study (n = 22)
Louie AV, Radioth Oncol 2015
in press