Background Image
Previous Page  86 / 136 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 86 / 136 Next Page
Page Background

Dies, lubricants

and

drawing

84

Wire & Cable ASIA – September/October 2012

www.read-wca.com

Historically the wire drawing industry in many parts of Asia

has chosen to use relatively low technology lubricants

for rod breakdown applications, the decision on which

product used being based largely on unit cost per litre/

kilo of the lubricant rather a consideration of the ‘total

cost of production’ which is the normal approach in more

developed markets.

There is no such thing as the perfect lubricant. If there were

it would be the case that it was extremely low cost, only

very little of it would be used and it would never have to be

changed. In reality this can never be the case. In virtually

any production process the only reason a lubricant is used

is to make the process run – without the lubricant the

ultimate final product cannot be manufactured.

In the case of wire drawing lubricants this logic is

equally true, but it is important to move to a ‘total cost of

production’ concept rather than simply looking at the unit

cost of the lubricant when justifying the lubricant to be

used. For wire drawing companies major running cost items

include:

• The cost of copper/copper rod

• Poor control of manufacturing tolerances

• Dies

• Energy

• Surface coatings

• Maintenance costs

• Scrap/reject/machine downtime

• Labour

• Waste disposal

Considering most of these individual areas of cost, the

amount spent on production lubricants is considerably

lower. When these areas are considered as the total cost,

the lubricant represents only a very small fraction of this

figure and yet performance of the lubricant can reduce costs

in many areas of the production process and lead to an

overall ‘total’ cost reduction.

As some specific examples in relation to rod breakdown

lubricants:

1 Copper/copper rod/quality

It is universally accepted that the quality of copper rod

directly influences the quality and efficiency throughout

all stages of the wire drawing process; and also quality

of the final product produced.

2 Control of manufacturing tolerances

In the same way that input rod quality is important at

every stage of the drawing process, it is the quality of

the wire produced from the rod breakdown machines

which govern the quality, efficiency and amounts of

reject material produced during subsequent re-drawing,

and then final processing operations (eg enamelling,

insulation, cable production, etc).

Obtaining the correct balance of levels of lubrication with

properties such as detergency, wetting characteristics

and long-term emulsion stability is essential and leads

to a high degree of technology and complexity in the

lubricant formulation.

3 Lubricant consumption/top-up

As stated, purchasers often focus on the unit price of

the lubricant when re-charging a lubricant system as it is

obviously a significant cost, particularly for large volume

rod breakdown systems.

The true cost of the lubricant actually should be

measured over the lifetime of the lubricant against the

tonnage of copper produced. The obvious example

of this is the amount of top up of fresh lubricant that is

used per tonne of copper wire produced. The total cost

of fresh lubricant added on a daily, weekly or monthly

basis can often be greater than the quantity used initially

to charge the lubricant system.

Differences between high and low quality lubricants in

amount of top up used can vary massively. High quality

lubricants typically will require in the order of between

0.25 and 0.75 litres top up per tonne of wire drawn for

rod breakdown (figures vary because of other factors

such as system size, rod and die quality, filtration quality,

water quality, etc). Some ‘good’ systems will even use

less than this.

Lower quality products on the other hand could require

10 to 20 times the amount of top-up lubricant. Whilst

higher technology products may appear expensive in

terms of unit cost, over the longer term they can and

often do show actual cost savings purely on the amount

of lubricant used over the lifetime of the lubricant

system. The reasons for this are generally quite complex

but relate to a large extent on factors such as emulsion

stability and reactivity of the lubricant to the copper

itself.

4 Associated product costs

In basic terms the lubricant is designed to produce high

quality wire and protect the dies and capstans from

excessive wear. Lubricant formulation development does

not stand still and formulators are constantly striving for

formulations which give better performance regarding

these functions. As before, simple logic would say that

some lubricants are better than others in the way they

perform – and therefore improved die and capstan life

are achievable as well as reductions in the amount of

maintenance required re die cleaning, re-polishing or

replacement. It should not be forgotten that maintaining/

replacing die sets – particularly if not done in a planned

manner – leads to lost production and therefore

increased cost. The same applies to any down time or

stoppages in production, for example wire breaks.

Batoyle Ltd – UK

Agent

: Ajex & Turner – India

Website

:

www.ajexturner.com

Drawing down the costs

The Mastersol range of speciality wire drawing lubricants from

Batoyle