![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0124.jpg)
ENTSOG TYNDP 2017 Public consultation questionnaire
No,
Q37:
Annex A provides project-level information,
through project fiches and overview tables (including
on perceived barriers to investment). Do you find the
Annex A format adequate?
If no, how can we further improve?
Current formula of Annex A (as well as Annex B) can
mislead stakeholders that all projects are accepted
(as included in the Plan) in spite of their negative
impact on competition or security of supply. Current
report includes only data provided by project
promotors. Thus, provided information about project
in some cases cannot be considered as fully reliable.
Therefore, we suggest to make an assessment of
the given data. In particular, it is crucial to assess
whether project enhances or disrupts competition on
the Internal Gas Market and its impact on
diversification of sources of supply.
PAGE 13: Assessment, Energy Transition and Gas Quality Outlook
Q38:
Would you like to provide input to the
Assessment section?
Yes
PAGE 14: Assessment, Energy Transition and Gas Quality Outlook
Q39:
ENTSOG endeavoured to increase the usability of the Assessment chapter in different ways. Please
specify whether these were useful to you:
Specific section of the Assessment chapter dedicated to
the identification of infrastructure need
Q40:
TYNDP 2017 introduces a country-level
monetisation of supply configurations resulting in
country-level supply prices. Do you find it valuable?
Q41:
TYNDP 2017 introduces an assessment based on
actual import price information. Do you find it
valuable?
Yes, this proved useful to me
Yes
Yes
Q42:
Which elements would you suggest to further improve?
Country level assessment should be as wide and comprehensive as possible. It should allow to understand the
impact of market integration and infrastructure development not only to the European market but also to specific
markets. An comprehensive analysis of the projects’ impact on competition and diversification of supply sources (not
only routes should be taken into account).
Q43:
ENTSOG publishes all TYNDP assessment
results in Annex E – Modelling results. Are these
results valuable to you?
Yes,
If yes, Could you indicate in which context? Do you
have any suggestion on the format of these results?
The data on the consequences of gas disruptions
are key to the analysis as they provide input to the
assessing the impact of projects on diversification of
gas supplies in MSs.
Q44:
ENTSOG provides the description of the
No
modelling tool and modelling methodology as part of
Annex F. Is this information valuable to you?