Previous Page  124 / 154 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 124 / 154 Next Page
Page Background

ENTSOG TYNDP 2017 Public consultation questionnaire

No,

Q37:

Annex A provides project-level information,

through project fiches and overview tables (including

on perceived barriers to investment). Do you find the

Annex A format adequate?

If no, how can we further improve?

Current formula of Annex A (as well as Annex B) can

mislead stakeholders that all projects are accepted

(as included in the Plan) in spite of their negative

impact on competition or security of supply. Current

report includes only data provided by project

promotors. Thus, provided information about project

in some cases cannot be considered as fully reliable.

Therefore, we suggest to make an assessment of

the given data. In particular, it is crucial to assess

whether project enhances or disrupts competition on

the Internal Gas Market and its impact on

diversification of sources of supply.

PAGE 13: Assessment, Energy Transition and Gas Quality Outlook

Q38:

Would you like to provide input to the

Assessment section?

Yes

PAGE 14: Assessment, Energy Transition and Gas Quality Outlook

Q39:

ENTSOG endeavoured to increase the usability of the Assessment chapter in different ways. Please

specify whether these were useful to you:

Specific section of the Assessment chapter dedicated to

the identification of infrastructure need

Q40:

TYNDP 2017 introduces a country-level

monetisation of supply configurations resulting in

country-level supply prices. Do you find it valuable?

Q41:

TYNDP 2017 introduces an assessment based on

actual import price information. Do you find it

valuable?

Yes, this proved useful to me

Yes

Yes

Q42:

Which elements would you suggest to further improve?

Country level assessment should be as wide and comprehensive as possible. It should allow to understand the

impact of market integration and infrastructure development not only to the European market but also to specific

markets. An comprehensive analysis of the projects’ impact on competition and diversification of supply sources (not

only routes should be taken into account).

Q43:

ENTSOG publishes all TYNDP assessment

results in Annex E – Modelling results. Are these

results valuable to you?

Yes,

If yes, Could you indicate in which context? Do you

have any suggestion on the format of these results?

The data on the consequences of gas disruptions

are key to the analysis as they provide input to the

assessing the impact of projects on diversification of

gas supplies in MSs.

Q44:

ENTSOG provides the description of the

No

modelling tool and modelling methodology as part of

Annex F. Is this information valuable to you?