Previous Page  222 / 270 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 222 / 270 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

DECEMBER 1980

Law School expenditure as between 1979 and 1980. In the

case of Law School, Mr. Curran pointed out that it had not

been running in its new form for the full year in 1979. Mr.

Curran also dealt with the query from Mr. B. Garvan on

the manner in which depreciation was treated. The

President thanked Mr. Curran for the work of the

Committee during the year.

Disciplinary

No comments arose on the Disciplinary Committee

report. The President thanked Mr. Doyle for the work of

the Committee.

Public Relations

The report was introduced by Mr. F. O'Donnell, who

was thanked by the President for the worthwhile coverage

achieved during the year. Speaking on the report, Mr. J.

F. Donovan commented that everybody could get on R.T.E.

programmes and into the Press if they professed to

criticise the legal profession. Since the Society appeared

to take no action on these criticisms, he wondered if it

was treating them as beneath contempt. The President, in

reply, referred to the Press Conference which he had

called, arising out of the programme on which Mr.

O'Donnell appeared. That Press Conference had received

wide publicity. Mr. O'Mahony suggested that there

should be, within the profession a small group to analyse

what was coming from the media, particularly T.V. and

radio, and ensure that the contrary view point had a right

of reply. He felt the profession should give a lead in this

matter, and he volunteered his services. He commended

the Public Relations Committee for the work done. The

President referred to the Symposia held during the year,

and those being planned for the coming year. These were

being organised to get the legal implications of various

situations across to the broadest possible spectrum of the

public. The Society's efforts in mounting the Symposia

had been very well received. Mr. Shields suggested that it

might be worthwhile for the Public Relations Committee to

consider organising television programmes, such as the

recent Richard Dimbleby Lecture by Lord Denning.

Education

The President thanked Mr. Buckley for getting the New

Course off the ground. Mr. T. C. G. O'Mahony congrat

ulated Mr. Buckley on the progress of the Law School

and on the Continuing Legal Education Programme.

However, he wondered if an undue surplus was being

made on the Continuing Legal Education Programme.

Mr. Buckley explained that the figures shown took no

account of the Society's overheads and that if these were

included in the costs, a break even situation would arise.

Mr. Meredith commented that the apprentice coming out

from the New Course was a far more mature and ex-

perienced person than the Old System apprentice who

frequently came straight from school. The problem today

was that Masters did not know how to use the new type of

apprentice and many of them were getting frustrated. It

was agreed in discussion that there was a need to

communicate with Masters on the position.

Publications

No comment arose on this report.

E.E.C. and International Affairs

The President thanked Mr. Monahan for the work of

the Committee during the year and for the manner in

which he had represented the Society at meetings of the

C.C.B.E. In reply to Mr. O'Mahony, Mr. Monahan

indicated that due to the massive amount of directives

regulations etc. issuing from Brussels, it was not possible

for an individual solicitor to keep abreast of develop

ments. The Committee was trying to highlight those

affecting the profession and also judgments of relevance

in the Gazette. In reply to Mr. O'Mahony's contention

that it was a serious matter if lawyers were not able to

keep abreast of the law, Mr. Monahan made the point

that while an enormous amount of material was coming

through from Brussels, it was, at the same time, quite

easy for a lawyer to follow through the material in which

he had a particular interest at any given time. Mr. Moore

said that in so far as E.E.C. literature was concerned,

there was need for a special library. This had been

brought to the notice of the Government some years ago.

but the cost of the project had killed it.

Premises

To Mr. Moran, who complained of the inadequate

toilet facilities in the Four Courts, the President

explained that the gents toilet on the ground floor had

been refurbished and put back into use. He added that the

Premises Committee was anxious for suggestions from

members as to how the Society's facilities might be

improved. Mr. M. Kenny suggested that the tourist

authorities be approached with a view to putting

Blackhall Place on the bus tour circuit. Miss McCarthy

asked if some definite arrangement could be made

regarding the Dining Room as she had come for lunch

on a number of occasions when it was closed, whereas on

other days it was open. Mr. Collins said that this

particular problem was under consideration at present.

He emphasised the importance of telephoning before

hand. Mr. Donovan pointed out that it was possible to

make a reservation through the Four Courts. Mr. Garvan

asked that some arrangements be made for the storing of

coats in safe custody in the Four Courts.

Company Law Committee

No matter arose.

Conveyancing Committee

No matter arose. The President thanked Mr. Shields

and Mr. O'Donnell for their work on these Committees.

Library

The President proposed a vote of thanks to Miss

M. Byrne, Librarian, and her staff, which was carried

with applause.

Bond Scheme

At the request of the President, Mrs. Moya Quinlan

drew the successful Bonds as follows: £ 1,000 Prize, Bond

Nos 1375, 1147, 1444 and 1221. £500 Prize, Bond

Nos. 1694, 1840, 1838 and 1 700. £250 Prize, Bond Nos.

1842 and 1281.

Questions

The President read the following question from Mr. T.

C. G. O'Mahony and Mr. A. F. Hussey:

'In accordance with Bye Law 13 of the

216