Previous Page  28 / 100 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 100 Next Page
Page Background

28

Speak Out

June 2016

www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

“Speech

pathologists should

be an essential

member of the

care and support

team for older

Australians.”

federal government investigate the service delivery

model of speech pathology services in residential

aged care with a focus on contracting arrangements.

Importantly, you recommended that a cost benefit

analysis be completed that considered the current

funding of speech pathology services in the aged care

sector. Whilst it is unfortunate that we are still waiting

a government response to your final report, we want

to assure you that our Association has valued your

work and over the past year and a half, has invested

our member resources to address some of your

recommendations that were able to be advanced

without government support. Many of these are within

the aged care space. I would be happy to speak

with you about these however I will now hand over to

Dr Bennett to highlight some workforce challenges

identified in recent research into the speech pathology

aged care workforce that we have co-led.

Although, we are still awaiting publication in peer

reviewed journals, preliminary results indicate that

speech pathologists working in the aged care sector

have identified a number of challenges to ensuring

older people have access to our expertise. Critical

barriers to services include current funding and

service delivery models that emphasise swallowing

assessment and do not fund communication

intervention. Staffing ratios are so low and case load

pressures so high that care can be compromised.

These pressures often lead to ineffective adherence

to our clinical recommendations for aged care clients.

This is made worse by the prevalent sub-contracting

arrangements where speech pathologists are largely

unable to influence policy and procedures within a

facility and have restricted opportunity to engage in

interdisciplinary care.

As the roll out of the aged care reforms progresses,

we are growing increasingly concerned about

arrangements that appear to further restrict

rather than enhance access to speech pathology

services for older people—particularly those

with communication problems and those within

community and home based settings. This has

repercussions on our workforce planning within our

profession—we know there is significant demand

for our services but there are persistent barriers

to supply. We are still seeing a lack of awareness

of the need for communication interventions in

residential aged care and funding for these services.

We know the entry point to the aged care system

relies heavily on an understanding of communication

and swallowing problems and the need to refer to

speech pathologists by Regional Assessment Service

Assessors. Sub-contracting arrangements for private

providers are growing increasingly complex and

problematic for our private sector. Furthermore, we

are still experiencing significant difficulty getting all

speech pathologists listed as providers on the My

Aged Care website.

We believe that Australian Government leadership is

crucial to progressing aged care workforce planning

in the context of the aged care reforms. Whilst the

sector has an important role to play in identifying and

improving workforce planning for the aged care sector

broadly, in a competitive market place, it is unrealistic

to expect the “sector” to determine the solutions

in isolation from government. We are certainly a

profession that would welcome concrete support

from government to help our workforce planning and

design. Thank you.”

Policy & Advocacy