Previous Page  22 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

ThreeMonths of Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy Usually

Suffices, With Less Neurotoxicity Than 6Months, in Stage 3

Colon Cancer

A prospective, pooled analysis of nearly 13,000 patients enrolled six phase II trials showed that 6 months of oxaliplatin-

based chemotherapy conferred less than 1% added benefit over 3 months.

T

his outcome of the International

Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant

chemotherapy (IDEA) was reported

at the European Society for Medical

Oncology (ESMO) 2017 Congress, from

September 8–12.

Axel Grothey, MD, of the Mayo Clinic,

Rochester, Minnesota, explained that

since 2004, 6 months of oxaliplatin-based

chemotherapy has been the standard of

care as adjuvant treatment for stage 3

colon cancer.

Oxaliplatin is associated with cumulative

neurotoxicities, so a shorter duration of

adjuvant therapy could spare toxicity and

substantially reduce costs.

Dr. Grothey and the IDEA investigators

analyzed six concurrently conducted, ran-

domized, phase III trials:

1. UK Short Course Oncology

Treatment (SCOT)

2. Three Or Six Colon Adjuvant (TOSCA)

3. C80702

4. IDEA France

5. Adjuvant Chemotherapy forcolon

cancerwith HIgh EVidencE (ACHIEVE)

6. Hellenic Oncology Research

Group (HORG)

The noninferiority of 3 vs 6 months of adju-

vant folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin

(FOLFOX) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin

(CAPOX) was assessed. The primary end-

point was disease-free survival, defined as

the duration from enrollment to relapse,

second colorectal cancer, and death from

any cause.

Noninferiority was declared when the ratio

(3 vs 6 months), estimated by a stratified

Cox model, was below 1.12. Noninferiority

was examined within subgroups of regi-

men and stage as preplanned.

The analysis included 12,834 patients

from 12 countries, accrued from June of

2007 through 2015. After 3263 (of 3390

expected) disease-free survival events,

noninferior for the shorter duration of ther-

apy, could not be confirmed for the overall

study population (hazard ratio 1.07, 95%

confidence interval 1.00–1.15).

Noninferiority of 3 vs 6 months was

seen for CAPOX (hazard ratio 0.95, 95%

confidence interval 0.85–1.06; whereas

3 months of FOLFOX proved inferior to 6

months (hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence

interval 1.06–1.26).

Patients treated with CAPOX suffered from

a higher rate of T4 colon cancer (24.3% vs

18.6%, P < .001) than those who received

FOLFOX. No significant differences were

seen, however, in N-stage, gender, or num-

ber of lymph nodes examined.

Significant, though small, differences

were seen in age and performance sta-

tus (1/2). Overall noninferiority results were

independent of age (<70, ≥70 years) and

gender.

Dr. Grothey concluded that the IDEA results

provide the basis for individual adjustments

of adjuvant treatment duration based on

risk of recurrence, patient preference, tox-

icity, and the chemotherapy regimen used.

Further analyses are warranted to explain

the differential performance of CAPOX and

FOLFOX with regard to the noninferiority

question.

The debate on whether to shorten adjuvant

chemotherapy for colon cancer from 6 to 3

months took center stage in a special ses-

sion at the ESMO 2017 Congress.

Alberto Sobrero, MD, of the Ospedale

San Martino, Genova, Italy, noted in a

written release that study findings were

practice-changing. The commonsense

conclusion of IDEA is that it’s not worth

going through the toxicity and inconven-

ience of 6 months to gain less than 1%

efficacy. Especially considering that toxic-

ity is cut by at least 50% with the 3-month

regimen.

Dr. Sobrero added that most patients pre-

fer the 3-month option, which confers much

lower toxicity for very little loss in efficacy.

In addition, overall there were minor differ-

ences in efficacy between 3 and 6 months,

high-risk patients should receive 6 months

of chemotherapy. CAPOX should be pre-

ferred over FOLFOX.

Eric Van Cutsem, MD, of University Hospi-

tals Leuven, Belgium, and main author of

the ESMO consensus guidelines for the

management of patients with metastatic

colorectal cancer, noted in the written

release that statistically, 3 months of treat-

ment was slightly inferior to 6 months in the

overall study population of stage 3 patients.

The clinical conclusion, however, given the

reduction in neurotoxicity with a shorter

duration of treatment, was that 3 months

is almost identical to 6 months.

He continued, in low-risk patients, the

difference was so minor that the clinical

conclusion is that 3 months of oxalipla-

tin-based chemotherapy is as good as

6 months. Though statistically the differ-

ence is small, this makes a huge clinical

difference to patients with the reduction

in neurotoxicity.

Regarding the standard of care for adjuvant

chemotherapy in stage 3 colon cancer, Dr.

Van Cutsem noted that in high-risk patients,

6 months remains the standard, but in low-

risk patients, 3 months should become the

new standard duration of treatment.

He confirmed that he uses this strategy with

his stage 3 colon cancer patients. In high-

risk stage 3 patients, he gives 6 months of

FOLFOX unless the patient suffers neuro-

toxicity, in which case he stops oxaliplatin

but continues with fluorouracil for a total of

6 months. In patients with low-risk tumors,

he gives 3 months of FOLFOX.

www.practiceupdate.com/c/58224

CONFERENCE COVERAGE

22

PRACTICEUPDATE ONCOLOGY