Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  103 / 198 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 103 / 198 Next Page
Page Background

1. Are the definitions

specified in the SMPR used

and applied appropriately in

the supporting

documentation (manuscripts,

method studies, etc...)? If not,

please explain the differences

and if the method is impacted

by the difference.

Yes.

2. Is there information

demonstrating that the

method meets the SMPR

Method Performance

Requirements using the

Reference Materials stated in

the SMPR? If not, then

specify what is missing and

how this impacts

demonstration of

performance of the method.

Yes. 3 NIST SRMs were used for demonstration of accuracy. Determination of

theanine in all 3 materials was within uncertainty of the assigned values.

3. Is there information

demonstrating that the

method performs within the

SMPR Method Performance

Requirements using the

Reference Materials stated in

the SMPR? If not, then

specify what is missing and

how this impacts

demonstration of method

performance.

Yes. 3 NIST SRMs were used for demonstration of accuracy. Determination of

theanine in all 3 materials was within uncertainty of the assigned values.

4. Is there information

demonstrating that the

method performs within the

SMPR Method Performance

REquirements table

specifications for all analytes

in the SMPR applicability

statement? If not, please

specify what is missing and

whether or not the method's

applicability should be

modified.

The method only addresses the determination of theanine. Method does not address

determination of catechins, methyl xanthines, or theaflavins.

The method is very specific for theanine and it does not make sense to extend the

applicability to the other analyte groups.

1. Based on the supporting

information, were there any

additional steps in the

evaluation of the method that

indicated the need for any

additional precautionary

statements in the method?

No.