Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  104 / 198 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 104 / 198 Next Page
Page Background

2. Does the method contain

system suitability tests or

controls as specified by the

SMPR? If not, please indicate

if there is a need for such

tests or controls and which

ones.

Yes. A blank check sample could be added to comply with SMPR.

Consider modifying the statements about retention times to include an acceptable %

deviation with a specified number of replicate injections.

3. Is there information

demonstrating that the

method system suitability

tests and controls as

specified in the SMPR worked

appropriately and as

expected? If no, please

specify.

Yes.

4. Based on the supporting

information, is the method

written clearly and concisely?

If no, please specify the

needed revisions.

Yes. I would add more guidance under the section for sample preparation to assist in

choice of sample size and extraction volume. Something like "Choose sample size

corresponding to approximately X mg of theanine".

5. Based on the supporting

information, what are the

pros/strengths of the

method?

The method is simple and straightforward (sonication extraction, chromatography,

detection).

The method has demonstrated accuracy via use of reference materials as well as

spike/recovery studies.

The method has demonstrated adequate precision as specified in the SMPR.

The method has adequate linearity, LOQ, and LOD as stated in the SMPR.

6. Based on the supporting

information, what are the

cons/weaknesses of the

method?

High marginal spike/recovery for liquid green tea product (108.7%).

The post-column reactor may be considered "specialized equipment".

Unknown how method would respond to gummies/chewables (2 difficult matrices).

Sonication extraction might not be sufficient.

Ruggedness tests showed sensitivity of the method to the ratio of sample mass to

extraction solution volume and also post-column reactor temperature. Adding a

statement to the sample preparation section can assist with the selection of appropriate

sample size and extraction volume, to reduce likelihood of such issues. In addition, a

statement could be added to the apparatus section regarding calibration of the post-

column reactor temperature.

7. Any general comments

about the method?

Very good method for determination of theanine. While it doesn't meet the full

applicability of the SMPR, it is promising as a method for theanine and could be used

in conjunction with another method for the other analyte classes.

Do you recommend this

method be adopted as a First

Action and published in the

Official Methods of Analysis

of AOAC INTERNATIONAL?

Please specify rationale.

The method is a strong candidate, but without understanding of how the method will

behave with gummies and chewables (2 difficult matrices that were specifically

indicated as important by the working group), I do not recommend that this method is

adopted as first action at this time.

I recommend that the authors conduct additional studies using gummy and chewable

supplements and resubmit, as the method has demonstrated potential.