Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  704 / 708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 704 / 708 Next Page
Page Background

14

Fund Family Shareholder Association

www.adviseronline.com

market. I’d call that a big loss for the

active-management camp.

The fact that tech-heavy funds

didn’t even match, much less beat the

stock market during last year’s

Tech

Winter

doesn’t mean it’s a strategy you

should ignore.

I think the evidence is pretty strong

that good tech managers can (and do)

outperform. But, of course, there are

periods when

Tech Winter

freezes up

completely, just like last year. As a chill

swept through the tech sector during

the November 1, 2000 to February 28,

2001 period, for instance, Fidelity’s

sector funds faced losses ranging from

Select Software

’s 33.2% decline to the

45.2% loss for

Select Computers

, com-

pared to a 12.9% drop for the S&P 500.

As has been said many times, there’s

no free lunch and no guarantees when

it comes to the stock market.

But if you’re betting on

Tech Winter

,

I wouldn’t necessarily go forVanguard’s

tech index fund or its ETF twin. Passive

investment strategies tied to technology

don’t always show their best sides dur-

ing the seasonally strong

Tech Winter,

even though it’s the stocks of com-

panies involved directly in the digital

revolution which typically exhibit good

relative strength. Based on the record, it

pays to go active.

When you look back over 24 dif-

ferent

Tech Winter

periods (the data

for MSCI’s tech index, the bogey for

Information Technology ETF, only goes

back that far), it has not paid to be a

tech-only indexing investor—Vanguard

funds with heavy allocations to tech

have consistently outperformed the

market, while Information Technology

ETF has not. It may be hard to see

in the chart below, but the tech index

has nicely outperformed the market

over the full 24-year period (by better

than two percentage points per annum),

despite the calamity of the bursting of

the tech bubble in 2000. Still, its record

during the four-month

Tech Winter

is

not consistent.

Though pronounced prior to the

tech bubble, the index’s market-beating

ways during

Tech Winter

haven’t held

a candle to the performance posted by

some of the active managers running

typically tech-heavy Vanguard funds.

Modeling Tech

Does this mean Jeff and I want

to bulk up some funds in the

Model

Portfolios

? Well, we don’t really have

to. We have plenty of handpicked

technology stocks in our portfolios

already. Between Capital Opportunity,

Dividend Growth

and the mid-cap

index funds in the

Growth Model

Portfolio

, for example, we have frac-

tionally more than

Total Stock Market

Index

’s 16.5% weight in tech—but

don’t forget that these are well-chosen

tech companies, not the broader col-

lection found in an index. So, as in

years past, I’m loath to make trades to

reallocate for the months ahead. Still,

it’s worth keeping your eye on this

seasonal tech ball, since, relative to the

overall market, technology can have an

outsized impact on our returns.

As always, I want to give you the

history of the

Tech Winter

phenomenon.

But before I get into the nitty-gritty

of the numbers, let’s talk a bit about

what this

Tech Winter

thing is and why

it occurs. Let me start by saying that

I take full responsibility for coining

the term “Tech Winter” to refer to the

four-month period between the end

of October and the end of February.

I know you won’t find it listed on

Wikipedia

, and a quick Google search

suggests that others have either ignored

or missed the phenomenon completely.

So, you may ask why tech stocks are

historically hot during these coolest of

months. While it may seem strange that

tech stocks follow a seasonal pattern,

there are actually a number of factors

I’ve found that can explain the outper-

formance.

The first has to do with fourth-

quarter spending by corporations.

Information technology managers (the

guys and gals who tend to your in-

house desktop and myriad other cor-

porate computing functions) usually

hold back some of the money in their

budgets during the course of the year

in case of a late emergency, or to spend

on some technological innovation or

product that becomes necessary for the

company to stay competitive as the year

progresses. A company, for instance,

may take months to decide that yes,

they do want salespeople to carry the

newest iPad, or that a new cyber-secu-

rity system must be put in place, but

when the decision is made, the buying

must begin immediately, or someone’s

head goes on the block.

3 Decades of Outperformance

(Average November to February Returns)

PRIMECAP Explorer

Morgan

MSCI

500

Growth

Info Tech

Index

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

Over 24

TechWinters

, the

IndexOnlyOutperformed in 10

0.75

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

3.75

10/92

10/94

10/96

10/98

10/00

10/02

10/04

10/06

10/08

10/10

10/12

10/14

10/16

Tech Winter:

November–February

MSCI Technology Index

vs. Total Stock Market

>

If you’re betting on Tech Winter, I wouldn’t necessarily

go for Vanguard’s tech index fund or its ETF twin.

Passive investment strategies tied to technology

don’t always show their best sides.