Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  705 / 708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 705 / 708 Next Page
Page Background

The Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors

November 2016

15

FOR CUSTOMER SERVICE, PLEASE CALL

800-211-7641

As the calendar draws closer and

closer to year-end, there may be unspent

money that needs to be used. Why?

Because the tech managers know that

next year, come budget allocation time,

if they have something left over from

the previous year, they’re likely to see

those budgets cut. They don’t want that,

so they spend liberally in the year’s final

months, upgrading a server here or an

office full of smartphones there. Also,

this year in particular, the presidential

campaign has made many companies

nervous, and spending may have been

dialed back a bit until after November

8, though in all honesty, over the past

several election cycles there is no dis-

cernible pattern for

Tech Winter

under-

performance or outperformance.

Finally, corporate spending also has

tax implications for companies that

want to cut down on what they owe

the government. Whatever the rationale,

this spending surge, referred to by its

practitioners as a “budget flush,” is

often noticed in the markets. And the

tech stocks that are expected to ben-

efit from this seasonal year-end spend-

ing begin rising on expectations of

increased earnings in the coming year.

Whether, in fact, this flush will occur is

always a question mark. And by the time

the question has been answered, stock

prices usually already reflect that—so

you want a manager who knows how

to get ahead of that move on your team.

A second and wholly separate factor

is Europe. European purchasers have in

the past accounted for a significant per-

centage of U.S. technology orders. It’s

typically the fourth quarter when they do

a lot of buying. In most years, this occurs

because of the longer summer vacations

European companies give their work-

ers, during which time orders slack off.

When workers return, orders begin rising

in the fall and through the winter, often

hitting a peak in the last few months of

the year. Now, given that the EU appears

to be on the mend, the European factor

could play a bigger part in a tech spurt.

However, let’s add in one more cata-

lyst that has typically helped tech stocks

late in the year: Discounting. Hardware

companies, beginning to retool for new

product launches, start offering dis-

counts on existing inventory to speed

sales. These discounts allow corporate

purchasers looking for proven technolo-

gy to buy the cheap, well-tested products

still sitting on manufacturers’ shelves.

The net effect is that technology com-

panies begin to see increased demand,

and tech stocks rally in advance of earn-

ings news.

Tech Winter

draws to a close

after the start of the new year, when

technology companies restock their

inventories and a new purchasing cycle

commences. As this happens, tech stocks

don’t necessarily underperform the stock

market as a whole, but they do become

less predictable in their movements, not

following the pattern commonly seen

between November and February.

As you know, Vanguard’s only tech

funds are Information Technology

Index and its ETF sibling. But over at

Fidelity, where active managers run a

host of tech-oriented funds, the evi-

dence that a smart tech investor can do

well during the four months of

Tech

Winter

is pretty compelling. Take a look

at the chart above showing the aver-

age four-month returns for a number

of tech-related Fidelity funds. (Jim

Fidelity Tech Fund Dominance

(Average November to February Returns for 30 Years)

Electronics Technology Software Computers

500

& ITSvcs.

Index

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

EXPECTATIONS

Law of Small Numbers

I’M GOING TO CALL THIS the “law of small numbers” because, indeed, when yields get tiny,

some funny things begin to happen. Take

Ultra-Short-Term Bond

, one of the newest of

Vanguard’s bond funds, which I think of as a money market alternative, even though Vanguard

says it isn’t.

The fund’s maturity is ultra-short, as the name implies, and comes in two flavors, the

Investor shares, with a $3,000 minimum and a 0.20% expense ratio, and the Admiral shares,

for which you need $50,000 to gain access to a cheaper 0.12% expense ratio.

Now, when you’re talking about ultra-short bond funds, I’m sure you realize that every penny,

and even every fraction of a penny, counts. Saving 8 basis points on your expense ratio should

mean you earn more money, right? Indeed, over the year ending in September, Admiral inves-

tors did a bit better than that, with a total return of 1.16% versus 1.01%, which means they

actually earned 15 basis points more.

But the route to this advantage is a rocky one. On a monthly basis, the Admiral shares out-

perform the Investor shares only 58% of the time. Yup, there was even one month early in the

fund’s life when the Investor shares showed a positive return while the Admiral shares posted

a loss. How could that be? Pennies.

Because the Investor shares began life at a $10 net asset value while the Admiral shares

started at $20, the Admiral shares have more increments in which to move up and down on a

daily basis. Through the end of October, there have been 166 days when the Investor shares

showed no change in price, but there’ve only been 145 days when the Admiral shares didn’t

move. And, depending on whether they moved or didn’t at month-end, when performance is tal-

lied and interest is reinvested, well, it’s the law of small numbers.

I think Ultra-Short-Term Bond is a great money fund alternative, with a fully taxable SEC

yield of 1.02%, which is 41 basis points higher than, say,

Prime Money Market

’s. But under-

stand that if you take a short-term view, you may not always like what you see when you buy

the Admiral shares. And frankly, you may still be better off using a tax-exempt money fund. At

month’s end, the taxable-equivalent yield on

Tax-Exempt Money Market

came to 0.99%.

Not bad for a fund with absolutely no movement in its price.

>