Book Reviews
Scarman (Leslie) — English Law—The New Dimen-
sion (Hamlyn Lecture, 26th Series). London: Stevens,
!974. 19cms., xi, 88p.; £1.50.
Lord Justice Scarman has given us some interest-
J
ng views in this new series of Hamlyn Lectures. The
learned author has considered in detail the question
whether English Law was capable of further growth
within the narrow confines of the Common Law
system. This is essentially a system of lawyer's law,
conceived, developed and adjusted by the judges and
B
y the legal profession; its home-made principles,
concepts and classifications, dominate the thinking of
Jhe profession in England, and they are preserved
hy a strict system of precedent. It is an independent
form of customary law, and its professionalism
depends on oral argument, but it is resistant to
change. The first limited challenge is the right of an
individual to petition the Commission of the European
Court of Human Rights; the current case about
Northern Ireland involving "disturbing practices of
interrogation" will undoubtedly lead to an inter-
national finding that English law fails to provide a
remedy. The author is more than justified in stating,
J
n relation to Community Law, that the power of
the British Parliament to make whatever law it likes,
and the power of the Judges to declare what laws
a r e
in those areas bound by statutory interpretation,
a r
e undoubtedly contrary to British international
obligations; he rightly criticizes the
"command
theory" which has dominated statute law. The social
challenge consists in the theory that we are all
entitled to the active protection of the State against
fne ills of poverty, disease and old age; in this respect
"te law has had to be flexible to meet different social
conditions. The main principle is that the right to
the national insurance benefits depends upon a
Person's contribution record, but it is absurd that
Jhe justice of the decision cannot be reviewed by the
Court subject to its being sufficiently flexible to meet
*
h
e challenge. T h e manner is which family law cases
have been administered is an example of the flexi-
bility of the Common Law.
There is of course in England a Council of
tribunals, whose function is to supervise tribunals
i
n
enacting the principles of Natural Justice; there
no such protection in Ireland; But the principle
l
hat the participation of the legal profession is desir-
.
e
to me et the difficulties the citizen experiences
l n
the securing of his right before tribunals is
u
ndeniable. The Court should also avail frequently
its discretionary remedy to make binding declara-
tions of right. The outworn theory that the role of
oe Courts is to be confined to the interpretation of
statutes is rightfully rejected as splitting the Common
Jl
aw
wide apart. The weakness of the English Com-
J?
0n
Law is that it is a legal system at the mercy of
ne Legislature and ultimately of the Executive; it is
Therefore essential to promote in England a Bill of
Sots which cannot be amended or repealed, as
there is no written Constitution; we are fortunately
much better protected in our Fundamental Rights
clauses. The English Welfare State is challenging the
relevance of the Common Law because fault, property
and even marriage are insecure bases for the
development of a modern law suited to present
needs; the administrative tribunals are bound to
assume more and more importance. It seems that
lawyers will be left to handle the criminal law and
the private disputes between citizens. The universality
of the law will be discarded; for our rights and
liberties would no longer be subject to the rule of
Law administered by the ordinary Courts, but to
administrative and political controls beyond the
reach of the law. This is the frightful prospect of the
future, and, in the event of a new Irish Constitution
being propounded, we must see that our Fundamental
Rights are not diminished by one iota.
Meaghen (P. J.)—Local Government in Ireland; fifth
edition revised by D. Roche. Dublin: Institute of
Public Administration, 1975. 32p., 22cm.; £0.50.
Mr. Meaghen, late County Manager of Limerick,
who died in 1971, edited the first three editions of
this booklet, and Mr. Desmond Roche has brought
the material on Irish Local Government up to date in
this latest edition. Mr. Meaghen had already explained
the subject with such clarity that Mr. Roche had
only to fill in the
lacunae
to bring the material up to
date. This he has most successfully accomplished.
Russell-Clarke (J.)—Copyright in Industrial Designs;
Fifth Edition by Michael Fysh. London: Sweet &
Maxwell, 1974; xxiii, 314p., 25cm.; £10.50.
This is the first edition of this well known work
not published by the original author, who had pub-
lished successive editions in 1930, 1951, 1960 and
1968. The broad substance and clarity of the chapters
of the work has not been altered, save that the more
up to date English case law and legislation has been
included, and particularly the Design Copyright Act
1968. The 1968 Act now accords "artistic copyright"
to registrable industrial designs for a limited time,
whether registered or not. The detailed rules as to
the nature of a design are fully set out in Chapter 2,
while subsequent chapters deal with novelty and
originality, and with publication. Then follow such
matters as correction and rectification of the register,
infringement of copyright in registered design, and
the detailed steps to be taken in an action for in-
fringement of registered design. If the owner of a
design which is invalid, and which does not cover the
articles complained of, can cause his rival in trade
much damage by the use of groundless threats of
legal proceedings, anyone who is aggrieved by such
unwarranted threats has the right to institute pro-
ceedings to restrain their continuance. There are
complicated rules relating to the overlap between the
126




