Previous Page  130 / 336 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 130 / 336 Next Page
Page Background

Copyright Ac ts and the Design Ac ts which are fully

explored. The nature of copyright in artistic works,

particularly in relation to originality, ownership and

infringement is fully considered. The effect of Articles

85 and 86 of the Treaty of Rome in relation to indus-

trial design receives full treatment. The Registered

Designs Act, 1949, and the Copright Act, 1956, with

the Rules relating thereto, have been fully set out

in Appendices.

In Amp Inc. v. Utilux Property Ltd.—(1972) R.P.C.

the definition of "design" in S. 1 (3) in the Registered

Designs Act 1949 was stated 'not to include any

method of construction, or features of shape or con-

figuration which are dictated solely by the function

which the article to be made in that shape has to

perform'. It was unsuccessfully contended in the

House of Lords that this exclusion only applies in

cases where the designer has no option but to design

an article in a particular shape because of the

function it has to perform; this related to electrical

terminals for washing machines. In Hensher Ltd. v.

Restawile Upholstery Ltd. (1974 2 All E.R. 420, the

House of Lords stated that, in the phrase "work of

artistic craftmanship", the word "artistic" is well

understood and needs no interpretation. It was a

matter of evidence in each case whether a work was

"artistic". In this case a three piece drawing room

named Diner was not protected by copyright because

it had no originality. Those are the two principal new

cases since the last edition. The publishers are to be

congratulated upon the setting and type, and lawyers

specialising in this subject will find this work of

paramount importance.

Delany (V. T. H.) — The Administration of Justice

in Ireland; fourth edition by Charles Lysaght. Dublin:

Institue of Public Administartion, 1975. vii, 105p.,

22cm.; £1.80.

When Professor Vincent Delany first published

this volume in 1962, it received wide commendations.

In subsequent editions, in 1965 and in 1970, as a

result of the learned author's premature death, Mr.

Vincent Grogan undertook to revise the work, and

this has now been successfully accomplished by Mr.

Lysaght. The first five chapters are unchanged; they

deal respectively with "The Sources of Irish Law",

"The Background of the Irish Judicial System", "The

System of Courts in Ireland from 1800 to 1921", "The

Constitutional Changes from 1921 to 1924" and "The

Courts since 1922". In dealing with the Criminal

Jurisdiction of the Courts, Mr. Lysaght has clearly

set out the functions of the new Director of Public

Prosecutions under the 1974 Act, and also the

revised criminal jurisdiction of the District Court,

the revised personnel of the Special Criminal Court,

and the proposals of the Committee on Court Prac-

tice and Procedure to abolish the Court of Criminal

Appeal. The learned editor, in relation to civil

jurisdiction had dealt very fully with appeals to the

European Court of Justice under Article 177 of the

Treaty of Rome, as well as under the European Con-

vention of Human Rights, including the Irish com-

plaint about violations of the Convention by Britain

in Northern Ireland.

The current civil jurisdictions of the Circuit Court

and of the District Court as well as the salaries of

Judges since March, 1975, are fully explained. In

discussing solicitors, it is unfortunate that the fact

that the profession will only be open to graduates

from October next is omitted. In discussing costs, it

is satisfactory that emphasis has been placed upon

civil legal aid. Mr. Lysaght has cautiously and

accurately brought the main work up to date, but it

would have been infinitely more interesting if he had

enlightened us with his own views on many of the

subjects covered.

Paul O'Higgins — First Supplement to a Bibliography

of Periodical Literature relating to Irish Law. Belfast:

Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 1975. 149p., 24cm.;

paperback; £2.95.

Dr. Paul O'Higgins, a graduate of Trinity College,

Dublin, and well known for his works on Labour

Law and scholarly contributions to learned journals,

is to be congratulated on producing the first Supple-

ment to his "Bibliography of Periodical Literature

relating to Irish Law". The objects of the Supplement

are to bring together a list of the most important

articles on Irish law, or published in Irish periodicals

on legal topics from 1966 to 1972; and to include

similar material omitted from the main work; for

example, the many important legal articles which

appeared in the Dublin University Magazine from

1833 to 1877. The industry of the learned author is

shown by the fact that the Supplement includes over

1,600 entries from more than 100 periodicals.

Dr. O'Higgins, in his Preface, notes that the study

of Irish legal history has begun to gather momentum

under the leadership of such distinguished scholars

as Professor Newark of Queen's University, and Pro-

fessor Hand of University College, Dublin. It is to

be regretted, however, that Dr. O'Higgins found no

relevant material in the Law Quarterly Review. This

appears to be a sad reflection on the state of legal

scholarship in Ireland.

It is perhaps expecting too much of the compiler

to have exhausted every possible resource. Those

working in the Irish field of academic law have had

their burden considerably eased by Dr. O'Higgins's

toil, and owe him a profound debt of gratitude.

This Supplement, like the main work, is superbly

cross-indexed. It is hoped that this Supplement will

be the first of a series issued over the next decade or

so, and the learned author is to be congratulated for

his continuing interest in Irish law.

One cannot but help experiencing a twinge

oi

jealousy that the Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly

should be able to produce such a meritorious work,

among several others, while in the Republic there is

a dearth of this kind of publication. Is it that we lack

academic lawyers of sufficient staying-power and

ability, or is it, as one is led to suspect, that they

cannot find a publisher?

G. M. Golding

127