Previous Page  160 / 336 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 160 / 336 Next Page
Page Background

Radios, Televisions and similar equipment and Con-

sten undertook not to sell competing products directly or

indirectly outside France. Grundig undertook not to de-

liver products directly or indirectly to anyone in

France except Consten. Grundig assigned'to Consten

a trademark which enabled Consten to sue any third

party importing Grundig products for infringement of

the trademark. Grundig had also imposed on all its

other concessionaires outside France an obligation not

to deliver directly or indirectly outside their respective

contract territories. The Commission held that this was

an agreement restricting competition wi'hin the mean-

inging of Article 85 (1) because Consten was free of

competition from o'her distributors of Grundig pro-

ducts in France. The Court subsequently held that

the Commission did not have to consider the whole

market for Radios, Televisions, and related products in

France in which Grundig products faced fierce compet-

ition from other brands, but that it was sufficient that

the agreement in question had the object of restricting

competition, and that, where the agreement in question

prevented other distributors on a national market

from obtaining supplies of well known branded goods,

Article 85 (1) applied.

In a significant English case,

Application

Des Gaz

S.A.

v Folks Veritas

(1974) C.M.L.R. 75, the English

Court of Appeal has held that Articles 85 and 86

create new torts in English Law* being undue re-

striction of competition and abuse of dominant posit-

ion, and that these are infringements which are to

be dealt with by an English Court. The Plaintiffs had

copyright in the design of a gas container and had

made an arrangement with an English firm to manu-

facture containers under licence. Th e Defendants had

commenced to manufacture a container of the same

shape and the Plaintiffs had taken an action to re-

strain them from so doing. A Defence along the usual

lines had been put in, but, before the reply was filed by

the Plaintiffs, Britain joined the Community and the

Defendants applied to have their Defence amended so

as to plead that the Agreement between Gaz and its

English concessionaire infringed Article 85 and that the

attempt to restrain the Defendant from marketing

their container was an abuse of a dominant position

under Article 86. The Court held that it was entitled

to so amend its Defence.

Taxation

While the importance of the cases arose under

Article 95 to 99 of the Treaty, those which deal with

tax provisions, has been diminished by the introduct-

ion of a uniform system of Turnover Tax, it is certainly

possible that further cases will arise under Article 95

in particular.. This Article restricting a Member State

from imposing any internal taxation on the products

of other Member States in excess of that imposed

directly or indirectly on similar domestic products:

At an earlier stage when Germany had a cascade

type of Turnover Tax it introduced a Turnover Equal-

isating Tax which was intended to have the effect of

equalising the price of imported goods with domestic pro-

ducts in order to compensate for the Value Added Tax

paid on the domestic product, but this gave rise to

difficulties. In the

Distilling

Wine

Case

(1971)

C.M.L.R. 435, a German Court held that where there

was an Equalisation Tax o f - 4% charged on import of

goods but the Export Refund given on precisely similiar

goods was only 0 . 5% there was very strong evidence

that the internal tax on the similar domestic products

was only 0 . 5% and that the equalisation tax was

therefore in brerch of Article 95.

A major group of cases heard together and usually

referred to by the name of the first of the cases,

Mol-

kerei-Zentrale

Westfalen/Lippe

Case (1968) C.M.L.R.

187,, held that a tax

%

imposed within the framework

of Turnover Tax designed to put all types of products in

the same fiscal position was an Internal Tax within the

meaning of Article 95, and that, if the tax levied on a

particular type of important exceed the total amount of

direct and indirect charges on the equivalent domestic

product, it would infringe Article 95 and 97. The

Court went on to hold that it would not be a tax of

equivalent effect to a customs duty and also held that

Article 95 did not prohibit a Member State from

imposing internal taxation on products imported

from other Member States where there were no

similar domestic product.

Conclusion

The remaining Articles of the Treaty have not given

rise to cases which are likely to involve the ordinary

citizen, save in so far as the Articles relating to the

jurisdiction of the Court are concerned which I do not

need to consider. It is clear that there are areas in which

the Solicitor in private practice who does not ret for

Multi National Corporations or Institutions of major

economic power will find himself involved in cases in-

volving E.E.C. Law.

One of the major difficulties which presents all of

us in coming to terms with E.E.C. legiclation and case

law is the problem of trying to familiarise ourselves

with the existing legislation and to keep up to date.

We in Ireland have become used to a situation where

in the absence of an adequate supply of text books, re-

ports and commentaries on the law, we have learned to

operate as best we can, frequently, so far as case law is

concerned, relying on the grapevine system. The situ-

ation with regard to E.E.C. Law is precisely the re-

verse. The amount of material that emerges from the

Community is totally indigestible principally because

of its bulk. The Official Journal of the Community

which is divided into two parts, one of which deals

solely with Legislation and the rest with the remainder

of the official activities of the Commission and the

Court, including Notes, not merely of cases that have

been decided but of cases which have been instituted

in the Court, emerges not merely five days a week but

frequently with three or four issues on a particular

day. The possibility of any person dealing with

this amount of material, other than on a whole time

basis, seems to me to be totally remote. I would sug-

gest that the average practitioner might confine h t a -

self to two publications, one being the Bulletin of the

158