Previous Page  247 / 336 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 247 / 336 Next Page
Page Background

COMPENSATION

FUND

COMMITTEE

Patrick F. O'Donnell

Chairman

Walter Beatty

Anthony E. Collins

Maurice R. Curran

Gerard M. Doyle

Ernest J. Margetson

Roderick D. O'Donnell

David R. Pigot

Mrs. Moya Quinlan

Thomas M. D. Shaw

4.1 The profession are obliged by statute to provide full indemnity to members of the public

who may suffer loss as a result of defalcation by any practising solicitor. The contribution for

the year under review was fixed at £20.

4.2 Payments from the fund in respect of ascertained losses and other expenses during the

year amounted to £43,160.

4.3 The book value of the Fund as at 30th April, 1975 was £412,260.

4.4 The report of the Compensation Fund for the year ended 30th April, 1975 is considered

satisfactory.

PRIVILEGES

COMMITTEE

Michael P. Houlihan,

Chairman

William B. Allen

Bruce St. J. Blake

John B. Carrigan,

Laurence Cullen

Thomas Jackson

John B. Jermyn

John Maher

Peter Murphy

Rory O'Connor

Brian Russell

Thomas M. D. Shaw

5.1 This Committee is charged under the Bye Laws with the duty of protecting the rights of

Solicitors and of any difficulties that might interfere with the practitioner in the exercise of

these rights. During the past year your Committee have met on eleven occasions on the date

of each Council meeting to consider matters circulated to them by the Secretariat as a result

of queries raised by colleagues within the preceding month.

5.2 On each occasion, urgent matters are dealt with as they arise, without appearing on the

formal agenda, but on many occasions the Committee were hampered in dealing with matters

submitted for want of complete information and supporting documentation.

5.3 Among the matters considered by the Committee were the following:

(a) An agreed scheme of co-operation between the Irish Auctioneers and Valuers' Institute,

the Institute of Professional Auctioneers and Valuers and Livestock Salesmen and the

profession, with a view to establishing a code of conduct between Auctioneers and

Solicitors to improve the working relations between both, and to eliminate the problems

that had arisen in various parts of the country where Auctioneers had been presenting

clients with initial proposals that did not incorporate all the terms that were necessary

and did not give the clients the benefit of independent legal advice.

Having considered this matter at a number of meetings, the Society circulated to the profession

an agreed code of conduct and agreement.

(b) The question of Professional Indemnity Insurance was considered at numerous meetings

by this Committee and arrangements are in hand for the continuance and improvement

of the existing scheme.

Michael P. Houlihan,

Chairman

(c) A number of colleagues submitted to the Committee demand notices issued by various

Hire Purchase Companies in the format of summonses designed to have a rather legalistic

appearance, and though submitted to date, it did" not merit action by the Society but the

situation is being kept under review.

(d) The Society considered the application by the Free Legal Aid Committee the establishment

of a full time Legal Aid Centre, and monitored the developments in this regard.

(e) Numerous complaints were received of English and Northern Ireland Solicitors practising

in the Republic. Appropriate action was taken with the Law Society in England and the

Law Society in Northern Ireland.

(f) The Society received numerous complaints of Solicitors advertising property in their own

name, this practice being particularly common in the Midlands.

(g) The Committee considered difficulties that had arisen in numerous instances where

colleagues had acted for both parties only to find that difficulties resulted. The Society has

considered on a number of occasions making a ruling that it would be unprofessional to

act for both sides except in a given circumstance. This matter was raised at the half-yearly

meeting in Westport and it was decided that a ruling would be adopted if in fact the

majority of the profession indicated their support for it.

.241