Previous Page  245 / 336 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 245 / 336 Next Page
Page Background

2.9 The Council's Bye-Laws and Regulations were redrafted during the year, and updated

and adopted in new form.

2.10 The impact of the E.E.C. has enormously increased the work of the E.E.C. Committee.

There is a continuous flow of draft directives from various Government Departments and the

Committee has been very fully occupied in dealing with the drafts, in putting forward proposals

and in meeting the Department Officials concerned and in meeting with and discussing the

draft Directives with representatives of other Member States. In this respect, there has been

full consultation and meetings with our colleagues in the North of Ireland, in England and

Scotland and in the E.E.C. countries, with particular reference to the movement of lawyers

within the European Community and the provision of service by lawyers in the various Member

States.

2.11 As the profession is aware, the National Prices Commission has appointed a Consultant,

Professor Dennis Lees, to review our remuneration under wide terms of reference. So that

Professor Lees may be fully informed, it is essential that every Bar Association consider in

detail the terms of reference and the queries raised by Professor Lees in his letter to the Society

and arrange to submit, if they have not already done so, a memorandum containing their

comments and submissions. Individual practitioners are invited to do so also. It is absolutely

essential to ensure that comments and submissions, where possible, be supported by statistics

or factual information which prove the validity of the comments and submissions made. A

number of practitioners undertook to assist Professor Lees by furnishing accounts and by

making their offices available for inspection. It is equally essential to ensure that all commitments

in this respect be honoured immediately and if there is any outstanding commitment by any

member of the profession, the individual concerned should immediately contact our Director

General.

2.12 During the year, the Council accepted with regret the resignations of Mr. Ralph Walker

(Dublin) and Mr. T. V. O'Connor (Swinford, both past Presidents, as well as that of Mr. Peter

O'Connell (Dundalk). Mr. John F. Buckley (Dublin) and Mr. Raymond T. Monahan (Sligo)

were co-opted to the Council. Mr. Rory O'Donnell (Dublin) was co-opted as the representative

of the Dublin Solicitors' Bar Association instead of Mr. Buckley.

REGISTRAR'S

COMMITTEE

Patrick F. O'Donnell

Chairman

Walter Beatty

Anthony E. Collins

Maurice R. Curran

Gerard M. Doyle

Ernest J. Margetson

Roderick D. O'Donnell

David R. Pigot

Mrs. Moya Quinlan

Thomas M. D. Shaw

Patrick F. O'Donnell,

Chairman

3.1 At the commencement of its year of office, the Registrar's Committee met on a number

of occasions, for the specific purpose of considering how best to expedite the handling of

complaints against Solicitors, and to expedite the workings of the Committee itself, and the

following was decided:

A. The practice hitherto followed of writing three letters to a Solicitor against whom a

complaint had been made, would be dropped. In future, one letter only would be written to

the Solicitor against whom a complaint was made and if the Solicitor failed to deal with the

complaint, before the lapse of seven days, a second letter would be written, requesting him to

attend before the Registrar's Committee, and notifying him that failure to attend would result

in the matter being referred to the Disciplinary Committee.

B. The Committee would meet each week instead of once every two weeks, to endeavour to

clear up the back log and to expedite the ever increasing number of complaints.

3.2 The adverse commentary in the News Media,.regarding complaints against Solicitors,

and concerning the delays of the Incorporated Law Society, in dealing with these complaints,

posed particular problems for the Registrar's Committee. The publicity itself resulted in an

acceleration of the number of complaints lodged and resulted in added pressure on both the

Secretariat and the Registrar's Committee.

It is a source of great concern to the Committee, that a great number of Solicitors against

whom complaints have been made, fail to deal with the complaint in the first instance, and

latterly failed, without notice, to appear before the Registrar's Committee, when required

to do so. Investigation by the Committee is thus hampered, and delay reflects not only on the

individual member of the profession, but on the profession as a whole and the Society in

particular. It has therefore proved necessary to be more vigilant and diligent in our handling

of these complaints.

3.3 The Committee found it necessary to take a special look at the area of Accountant's

Certificates. At one period during the year, there were in excess of one hundred Solicitors who

had not filed Accountant's Certificate within the specified period, and some of these dated back

as far as 1971. It was therefore decided that these Solicitors would be notified that should their

Certificates not be filed within a period of eight weeks, then the Society's Accountant would

go to inspect their Books.

.

239