Previous Page  316 / 336 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 316 / 336 Next Page
Page Background

but through the headphones, to an interpreter—and of

course the quality of the interpretation varies enor-

mously, and, however good it is, it is not like listening

to a solicitor directly.

So written pleadings (in direct actions) and written

observations (in references for preliminary rulings),

dominate, because they can be properly translated at

leisure, and one can then read the translations.

The procedure differs slightly as between direct

actions and references for preliminary rulings. The pro-

cedure in staff cases is the same as in direct actions,

except that they are heard by a Chamber instead of by

the full Court.

Requisite pleadings

In direct actions there are four pleadings—the Ap-

plication, the Defence, the Reply and the Rejoinder.

The Application is the document that originates the

proceedings and at the same time sets out the Defen-

dant's case. The Reply and Rejoinder are optional.

As I have tried to indicate, pleadings in direct

actions are not intended to fulfil the same limited pur-

pose that pleadings fulfil in an Irish Court. They are

the main vehicle for the parties to present their cases

to the Court. Each party sets out in his pleadings not

only what he says the facts are, but also his 'sub-

missions of law, the arguments in support of those

submissions and the authorities on which he relies. He

annexes to his pleadings any documentary evidence on

which he relies, and if he wants any witness to be

called, he says so in his pleadings.

Another thing that differentiates proceedings in this

Court from proceedings in an Irish Court is that the

parties do not in general serve documents on each

other, or deliver them to each other. Pleadings are

lodged at the Registry of the Court and it is the job

of the Registry to serve them on the other party or

parties. For this purpose, parties to direct actions are

required to have an address for service in Luxembourg.

What this means, in practice, for parties represented

by Irish Solicitors, is that their Solicitors have to have

a Luxembourg agent, who can, so far as the Rules go,

be anybody at all with an address in Luxembourg, but

is usually an avocat from Luxembourg.

1

When an Application originating a case arrives at

the Registry, the case is given a number e.g. 1/75

for the first case of 1975, and it is at once assigned by

the President to one of the Judges, to act as Rapporteur,

and to one of the Advocates General.

At the close of pleadings, the Court decides whether

any issue of fact raised in the pleadings needs to be

determined by wh?t is called a "preparatory inquiry".

The judic al technique here is rather like that of an

order for a Chancery inquiry in the High Court. An

inquiry may be conducted either by the full Court,

or by a Chamber or by the Judge Rapporteur,

with, in every case, the Advocate-General. Such an

inquiry may involve the personal appearance of one

or more of the parties, or the production of further

documents or information by the parties, or the exam-

ination of witnesses, or experts' reports, or an inspection

of the place or thing in question.

But inquiries are rare. Most cases go straight to a

hearing.

After the hearing there is an adjournment during

which the Advocate-General writes his opinion and it

is, so far as necessary, translated. About three weeks

later he delivers it. Then, after another adjournment,

the judgment is delivered.

In references for preliminary rulings the procedure

is very similar, except initially. The National Court or

Tribunal making the reference sends its order for refer-

ence direct to the Registry of this Court. It is then

translated into all the other Community languages and

served by the Registry on the parties, on the Member

States, on the Commission, and on the Council if an

act of the Council is in issue. Within two months, any

of these may submit written observations on the ques-

tion or questions referred. In practice, the Commission

always submits observations, the parties normally do

so, and Member States sometimes do so. There are

usually no preparatory inquiries, as the questions re-

ferred are pure questions of law. There is then a hear-

ing which the parties are not obliged to attend, al-

though they usually do and the Commission almost

always does. As there is only one round of written

observations, the hearing is the only opportunity the

parties have of commenting on each other's observa-

tions. The hearing is followed in the usual way after

an adjournment by the Advocate-General's opinion,

and after another adjournment by the ruling of the

Court.

The Court, as I have said works fast. A preliminary

ruling is normally given within between four and eight

months of the receipt of the order for reference at the

Registry. Direct actions take rather longer, but seldom

more than a year.

Costs awarded by the Court

A reference for a preliminary ruling is considered to

be a step in the proceedings before the National Court

or Tribunal concerned and the costs therefore to be a

matter for that Court or Tribunal, except that the

Community Court can grant legal aid to any party out

of its own funds. This is a particularly valuable power

particularly in social security cases.

In direct actions costs are awarded by the Court on

very much the same sort of principles as apply in an

Irish Court. The main difference is that detailed

taxations are unknown. The parties are expected in

general to agree the quantum of costs. If they fail to

agree, the quantum is assessed by a Chamber on prin-

ciples that appear to me to be similar to those of our

Schedule II. I should also add that, in direct actions,

the Court can also grant legal aid.

One can sum up the role of the Court in the

European Communities in the words of Article 164

of the EEC Treaty—(there are Articles in the same

terms in the other two founding Treaties). Article 164

says : "The Court of Justice shall ensure that in the

interpretation and application of this Treaty the law is

observed"". There you really have it all. European inte-

gration

is founded on the rule of law,

and the Court

is the central instrument to ensure that practical effect

is given to that ideal.

.309