Common AgricuTurd Policy which vary from restrici-
ions on imports ffmuigh levies on imports, through
restrictions on exports, and conversely refunds paid on
exports through schemes
0
|x:ratcd by the various Nat-
ional Governmen's, with the assistance of the European
Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (Feoga).
Cases have arisen on almost all .of the measures
taken hv the Community.
M any of the schemes put into eilect by the Com-
munity in the Agricultural area have involved die
National
Government
in participating in
certain
measures and on a number of occasions the failure of
the National Government to take the necessary steps
has led to li igation before the European Court.
In the case of
Lconcsio v Italian Ministry of Agri-
c u l t u r e,
Case 93/71 (1973) C.M.L.R. 343, t h c - Com-
niunily had introduced by regulations a scheme where-
by farmers were to be encouraged to reduce the stock
of dairy cows by slaughtering. A premium was to be
paid to cattle owners who undertook to give up milk
production completely and to have all milch cows
slaughtered by a certain date. Signora Leoncsio was a
widow who farmed in the province of Brescia who
owned five dairy cows and applied to take advantage
of the scheme. Provisional authorisa'ion for slaughter
issued, the premium was agreed, the slaughter was
carried out, and the prescribed proof submitted to the
Provincial Agriculture Inspectorate. Half of the pre-
mium was to be financed from Community funds, the
other half to he paid by the Government of Italy, but
it turned out that the Italian Government had n il
arranged for the adoption of a statute to provide the
necessary funds, for paying such premiums. Signora
Lconcsio went to the District Court in Lonalo who,
faced with this, referred the matter to the European
Court for a ruling as to w hether once all the prescribed
formalities had been compiled with by a farmer, a
right 'o payment had been created which could not be
affected by the omission of the Government to arrange
for the passing of the ncccssary legislation. In due
course the European Court held that the right of pay-
ment could no', be subjected at the National level
to implementation provisions differing from those laid
down by the regulations and that Signora Lconesio's
payment was due once she complied with the regul-
ations.
Subsequently the Commision took
proceedings
against Italy
in Case No. 3 9 / 72 (1975) C.M.L.R. 439
and the Court not merely followed i's decision in the
Leoncsio
case, but also indicated that delay by a Mem-
ber State in in'roducing systems of premiums where
precise time limits had been provided for in the regul-
ations was in itself a default in the Go v e r nme n ts
obligations.
Insurance
problem
í
/olver/
I
T
¥
„
V*»w /•#**.••„»..,
H
-- i iiTteiivTin ml .a'. «nfr'rir- -' ' - "''''"*•'
Coyle Hamilton Hamilton Phillips Group,
Incorporated Insurance Brokers,
Phoenix House, Sth. Lelnster St., Dublin 2.
Telephone 687211.
Co y le Hamilton, t h r ough specialised c om-
I
panies, provides the c omp l e te range of
i nsu r ance services from a single source.
W e specialise in industrial a nd c omme r-
cial i n s u r a n c e; offer risk m a n a g e m e nt
a nd valuation services. Life a nd Pensions;
International Insurance; Bloodstock; Re-
insurance; Re g i on al services a nd tailor-
ma d e services for the smaller business-
ma n — all are provided.
W i th Coyle Hami l t on you get the best of
both worlds — p e r s on al service by e x p e rt
executives, b a c k ed by the r e s ou r c es of a
big professional organisation.
\
85




