Background Image
Previous Page  32 / 96 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 96 Next Page
Page Background

EuroWire – November 2011

30

Transat lant ic Cable

Perhaps ttingly, the eight “debaters” on the manufacturing

panel were likewise split; and their division was along

professional lines. As noted by the

Times

, business people saw a

bright spot in a sector long in decline. Economists did not.

Is it possible that manufacturing might help the US

economy recover and produce needed jobs? Or is domestic

manufacturing – at least in the traditional sense – a relic of

the past, incapable of rescuing the American labour market?

Here, abridged and lightly edited, is a response from one of the

optimists:

“Productivity and Quality Are Up” is the title chosen by Lei

Chen, a research fellow at the American Institute for Economic

Research (Great Barrington, Massachusetts). In the main he

sticks to those topics, noting that manufacturers are returning

to America and hiring new workers. Last year, US manufacturers

created 136,000 net new jobs, the rst increase since 1997.

Mr Lei went on to make these points:

US rms have good reasons to come home. One is economic.

China, the primary destination of outsourced jobs, is

becoming more expensive. America’s labour productivity –

a key factor in determining pro t – is among the best in

the world

Small and mid-size American manufacturers, less able than

their bigger counterparts to build factories overseas, have

the advantage in quality control and on-time delivery.

Moving production back to America also shortens the

supply chain, enabling stateside manufacturers to adjust

production when necessary, avoid delays, and get to market

quickly

Mr Lei noted that a container ship takes two weeks to travel the

6,000 miles from China to the US west coast. Clearing customs

and reaching domestic outlets further slow a product’s journey.

In his view, shortening the supply chain can make a critical

competitive di erence.

Some statistics round out the optimistic outlook. In 2010,

manufacturing contributed 12% of the gross domestic

product (GDP) of the US and 9% of total non-farm

employment. US manufacturing output ranked rst in the

world, accounting for more than 20% of total manufacturing

output worldwide. “Made in America” is back, according to

Mr Lei. He wrote: “While manufacturing might not be the

ultimate force that fuels the economic recovery and puts the

country back to work, it will certainly play a major role.”

Steel

The world’s largest producer of niobium

(Brazil) and its largest importer (China)

feature in a $1.95 billion deal

A group of ve Chinese companies led by the stainless steel

producer Baosteel has acquired a 15% stake in the Brazilian

rm Companhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e Mineração (CBMM),

the world’s leading niobium producer, for $1.95 billion. Noting

the “strategic value [of the deal] for all parties,” Baosteel said in

a statement that world demand for niobium grew at an annual

rate of about 10% from 2002 through 2009, re ecting the

importance of the mineral in the production of high-grade steel

alloys. China is the world’s biggest importer of niobium.

Baosteel’s partners in the stake, all Chinese, are CITIC Bank

and the steel makers Anshan Iron & Steel, Shougang Corp,

and Taiyuan Iron & Steel. The September news came after

the purchase in March of another 15% stake in CBMM, also for

$1.95 billion, by a group that includes South Korea’s Posco

and the Japanese companies JFE Steel and Nippon Steel. As

noted by

Business News Americas

(2

nd

September), demand for

niobium is expected to outpace the expansion in world crude

steel production. Brazil has the largest proven niobium reserves

anywhere, followed by Canada and Australia. According to the

private mining association Instituto Brasileiro de Mineração

(Ibram), in 2010 Brazil produced approximately 80,000 metric

tons of niobium, or 96% of total global output. CBMM by itself

commands an 80% share of the niobium market worldwide.

Nucor’s impressive second-quarter

earnings performance was enhanced by

a surge in pricing strength

Ever the maverick – even under barely post-recessionary

conditions – Nucor Corp (Charlotte, North Carolina) posted

second-quarter net earnings of $299.8 million, as compared with

net earnings of $159.8 million in the rst quarter of 2011 and of

$91 million in the second quarter of 2010.

Doing the arithmetic, the largest mini-mill operator in the

US said that these numbers indicate pro t increases of 88%

and 229%, respectively. For the rst half of 2011 the company

reported net earnings of $459.6 million, compared with net

earnings of $122 million in the rst half of last year.

Nucor pointed out that these results were achieved despite

some signi cant dampening factors: the rebalancing by its

customers of supply chain inventories, the impact on the

manufacturing/automotive sector of the earthquake and

tsunami in Japan, and lost production, sales and shipments from

weather-related power outages and Mississippi River ooding.

Acknowledging “the very real shock waves that shot through

the [US steel] industry” in the aftermath of the Japanese tsunami

in March, investment advisor Christopher Barker of

Motley Fool

pronounced Nucor’s “de ant” increase in net pro t over the

prior-year period a truly remarkable achievement. But he also

placed the extraordinary results in a broader context than that of

a sharp downturn in domestic growth momentum.

Mr Barker wrote (22

nd

July) that an overdue surge in pricing

strength may have spared the entire industry from feeling

the full impact of rising input costs, supply-chain disruptions,

reduced capacity utilisation, and other operational challenges.

Nucor’s consolidated sales volume grew only 1% over the

prior-year period, but the company’s realised sales price per

ton surged by 21%. Accordingly, “Sales revenue expanded 22%

to $5.1 billion, while net earnings skyrocketed 229% to nearly

$300 million.”