S991
ESTRO 36 2017
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Material and Methods
Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans (3D-CRT)
for patients treated in our hospital were analysed. The
analysis and assessment of differences in calculations
obtained with two TPS were performed for 160 and 130
patients treated with 6 MV and 15 MV X-rays, respectively.
3D-CRT treatment plans were prepared in the Eclipse TPS
(Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm, version 10).
Subsequently the DICOM RT data were transferred to the
Oncentra MasterPlan TPS (Collapsed Cone Convolution,
version 3.3) and dose distribution was calculated. The
same number of monitor units were kept. The differences
between mean dose in the PTV and dose in the isocenter
were compared. For statistical analyses, the Wilcoxon
matched-pair signed rank test was used. In addition, the
calculations of both TPS were compared with
measurements performed in the inhomogeneous phantom.
Results
The statistically significant (p < 0.001) systematic shift
between systems, both in the mean dose in the PTV and
dose in isocenter was observed. The doses calculated in
the Oncentra MasterPlan TPS were always lower than
doses calculated in the Eclipse TPS. The average
difference of mean dose delivered to the PTV was 1.4% ±
1.0% for 6 MV X-rays and 2.5% ± 0.6% for 15 MV X-rays. The
average difference in dose in the isocenter was 1.2% ±
3.5% and 2.4% ± 2.7% for X6 MV and X15 MV, respectively.
In most cases the largest differences were caused by air
cavities and bone structures. The significant influence of
inhomogeneities on dose calculations was confirmed by
measurements.
Conclusion
Estimated differences of dose calculations in most cases
did not exceed the action level of 3% recommended by the
Knöös et al. publications (2006 Phys. Med. Biol., 51: 5785–
5807). Based on this study the independent verification of
the Eclispe TPS calculations was introduced in our
hospital.
EP-1836 Study of changes in bowel gas in pelvic
radiotherapy
A. Horne
1
, M. Zahra
1
, W. Keough
1
1
NHS Lothian, Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh, United
Kingdom
Purpose or Objective
To assess volumetric changes in pelvic bowel gas using
serial CT scans in patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy.
Material and Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of bowel gas
volume and location using planning CT scans for 22
patients. All patients had an initial plan scan (CT1) with a
full bladder . In group 1 (n=9) this was compared with a
planning scan(CT2) done after about 30 minutes of CT1
with an empty bladder . In group 2 (n=15) CT1 was
compared with a CT scan (CT3) done for a phase 2
boost 4 weeks after CT1.
Eclipse
TM
planning software was used to contour
the luminal bowel gas volume within a conventional pelvic
radiotherapy field (see figure 1). For each of the 2 groups
the total volume and the volume in each quadrant was
measured and compared. Significance testing was carried
out using a paired t-test with two-tailed significance
levels
at 0.05.
Results
The results have been summarised in the table below:
Conclusion
In group 1 no significant difference was identified due to
changes in bladder volume over a short period of time. In
group 2 there was a tendency towards an increase in bowel
volume over the 4 week period of radiotherapy more so in
the upper quadrants reflecting changes mainly in the colon
rather than in the rectum. This is possibly due to the
radiotherapy toxicity and associated diet changes.
The volume of bowel gas does not appear to be consistent
during a course of pelvic radiotherapy and this should be
taken into consideration when dosimetry changes are
made to the initial planning scan to compensate for bowel
gas.
Electronic Poster: RTT track: Image guided radiotherapy
and verification protocols
EP-1837 Dosimetric effect by rotational error in VMAT
on Brain tumor patients
H. Park
1
1
Yonsei University, Radiation Oncology, SEOUL, Korea
Republic of
Purpose or Objective
This study is to evaluate the dose effects on whether
Hexapod Couch is applied for patient positioning errors to
be corrected in the course of VMAT on brain tumor
patients.
Material and Methods
For this study, a total of 1129 cases of CBCT acquired from
46 brain tumor patients with VMAT and Hexapod used are
comparatively analyzed and difference on dose effects is
evaluated by dosimetric quality
assurance(DQA) and