Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  270 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 270 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S257

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion

The availability of a real-time 4D dose accumulation based

treatment assessment tool allows to assess the quality of

the delivered dose during progress of the treatment course

and to take appropriate actions, as for example, plan

adaptation, in cases of significant deviations. It is foreseen

to extend this study for a full treatment course of a

broader population of patients.

OC-0489 Variation in bladder volume and associated

spatial dose metrics in prostate and pelvic

radiotherapy

O. Casares-Magaz

1

, V. Moiseenko

2

, A. Hopper

2

, N.J.

Pettersson

2

, M. Thor

3

, R. Knopp

2

, J.O. Deasy

3

, L.P.

Muren

1

, J. Einck

2

1

Aarhus University Hospital - Aarhus University, Medical

Physics, Aarhus, Denmark

2

University of California San Diego, Radiation Medicine

and Applied Sciences, San Diego, USA

3

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Medical

Physics, New York, USA

Purpose or Objective

The bladder displays considerable inter-fractional changes

during a course of radiotherapy (RT) which leads to

differences between delivered and planned dose/volume

metrics. The aim of this study was to compare planned

with actually delivered spatial bladder dose distributions

for patients receiving RT for prostate cancer with a full

bladder/empty rectum protocol, by using daily on-board

cone-beam CT (CBCT) and to assess impact of

concomitantly treating the pelvic lymph nodes.

Material and Methods

Twenty-five prostate cancer patients (fifteen cases

receiving local prostate irradiation and ten cases also

receiving pelvic node irradiation) received daily CBCT-

based image-guidance RT (81 Gy in 45 fractions) adhering

to full bladder and empty rectum protocol. For each

patient, 8-9 CBCTs were registered to the planning CT

using the clinically applied patient set-up (translations).

Bladder was segmented on each CBCT and approved by a

radiation oncologist. Bladder shells were extracted using

a 3mm inner margin, and bladder shell quadrants were

created using axial and coronal planes drawn through the

center of mass of the bladder. Dose/volume histograms

(DVHs) were extracted for bladder, bladder shell (BS), as

well as anterior (A), posterior (P), superior (S), inferior (I),

A/I, A/S, P/I, P/S sectors of the BS in each planning CT

and CBCT. Differences in DVH metric between the planned

and the delivered were calculated, and the association

between DVH metrics and bladder volume was evaluated

using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r

s

). DVH

metrics per fraction (D

x

, absolute V

x

and relative V

x

; x:5-

100% in 5% steps) were calculated for all bladder sectors

and compared between the two groups of patients.

Results

Bladder volumes varied considerably during RT, with a

coefficient of variation ranged between 14% to 54% across

treatment. Lower bladder volumes were found for

patients receiving pelvic RT compared to patients treated

locally (population mean±SD: 173±94cm

3

vs. 217±119 cm

3

;

p<0.01). At the anterior and superior part of the bladder,

positive associations were found between DVH metrics and

bladder volume for pelvic node irradiation fractions, while

negative associations were found for prostate alone

fractions, 25% and 75% r

s

percentiles: (0.74, 0.93) and

(0.78, 0.96) of S and A/S sectors for pelvic RT vs. (-0.79, -

0.43) and (-0.80, -0.40) of S and A/S sectors for prostate

RT across all Vx metrics (Fig. 2). Similar trend was found

for the BS 25% and 75% r

s

percentiles: 0.91-1.00 vs. 0.09-

0.61; however, for the whole bladder, differences were

smaller between 25% and 75% r

s

percentiles: (0.93, 1.00)

vs. (0.23, 0.71) for pelvic and prostate RT, respectively.

Conclusion

CBCT-based bladder analysis exhibits significant volume

changes along RT course even under full bladder daily

image-guided RT protocol. Larger bladder volumes meant

higher delivered doses to the superior and anterior

bladder subsectors in pelvic node irradiation, but reduced

overall delivered doses for prostate treatment.