Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  391 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 391 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S376

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

to late toxicity, there is no significantly difference in late

GI (RR=1.04, 95%CI: 0.88-1.23,

p

=0.63) and GU toxicity

(RR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.47- 2.40,

p

=0.26) at 5-years. Since

severe heterogeneity were existed, we also divided these

studies into dose-escalated and no dose-escalate H-RT

group. Dose-escalated H-RT increased in late GI toxicity

(RR=1.80, 95%CI: 1.32-2.43,

p

=0.0002) and GU toxicity

(RR=1.38, 95%CI: 1.07-1.79,

p

=0.01) significantly, while no

dose-escalated H-RT did not (GI: RR=0.82, 95%CI: 0.68-

1.00,

p

=0.05; GU: RR=0.92, 95%CI: 0.72-1.16,

p

=0.46).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis provides more reliable evidence that H-

RT decreased biochemical failure rate, while did not

improve overall survival. For dose-escalated H-RT also

decreased BCDF rates, and accordingly increased late GI

and GU toxicity, while for those without dose-escalated H-

RT, there is no difference in BCDF and late GI and GU

toxicity.

PO-0725 Sigmoid colon is an important organ at risk

for high-grade faecal urgency after pelvic radiotherapy

R. Jadon

1

, P. Parsons

2

, L. Hanna

1

, M. Evans

1

, J. Staffurth

1

1

Velindre Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical

Oncology, Cardiff, United Kingdom

2

Velindre Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Physics,

Cardiff, United Kingdom

Purpose or Objective

Faecal urgency is a common symptom after pelvic

radiotherapy negatively impacting quality of life for

survivors of pelvic malignancies. Compared with other

symptoms such as rectal bleeding and incontinence, dose-

volume predictors of faecal urgency are not well

established and have not been discussed in the QUANTEC

reviews. In this study dose-volume predictors of faecal

urgency and constraints to potentially prevent it are

sought.

Material and Methods

Patient-reported late bowel toxicity data was collected

for patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy 12 months

post-treatment using the subjective LENT-SOMA patient

questionnaire. Treatment plans for these patients were

retrospectively analysed with contouring of potential

organs at risk including bowel loops, bowel bag, small

bowel, large bowel, sigmoid, rectum and anal canal.

Dose-volume predictors for these organs were sought using

multivariate logistic regression analysis, with a p-value of

<0.05 considered significant. Constraints from these

significant dose-volume predictors were then determined

to dichotomise patients into those with and without faecal

urgency. Chi-squared analysis was used to assess the

'goodness of fit” of these constraints. The constraints were

re-explored on the 24 months post-treatment toxicity data

for the same patients.

Results

203 patients returned questionnaires including 128

prostate and pelvic node patients, 19 bladder patients, 38

endometrium and 18 cervical cancer patients. 73% were

treated with conformal radiotherapy and 27% with IMRT/

VMAT. Faecal urgency was reported by 52% of patients,

with 41% reporting high grade (grade 3-4 toxicity), defined

as 'daily” (grade 3) or 'constantly” (grade 4). There was no

clear difference in urgency rates by diagnosis or

radiotherapy technique used.

Dose volume parameters of bowel loops, large bowel and

sigmoid were predictive of faecal urgency. However only

sigmoid parameters (V10, V15, V25) could be used to

derive statistically significant constraints below which

toxicity would be clinically acceptable. These constraints

are detailed in the table below. At 24 months these

constraints still demonstrated the ability to dichotomise

patients with and without toxicity, although not

statistically significantly.

Conclusion

These results suggest sigmoid colon to be a responsible

OAR for faecal urgency, and reduction of sigmoid dose may

improve faecal urgency rates for pelvic radiotherapy

patients. Further validation of the constraints derived in

an independent sample of patients is required.

PO-0726 Dose escalation with HDR brachytherapy for

intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer

R. Chicas-Sett

1,2,3

, F. Celada

1

, J. Burgos

1

, D. Farga

1

, M.

Perez-Calatayud

1

, S. Roldan

1

, E. Collado

1

, B. Ibañez

1

, J.

Perez-Calatayud

1

, A. Tormo

1

1

La Fe Polytechnic and University Hospital, Radiation

Oncology, Valencia, Spain

2

Universidad Católica de Valencia "San Vicente Mártir",

Escuela de Doctorado, Valencia, Spain

3

Recoletas Oncology Institute- Campo Grande Hospital,

Radiation Oncology, Valladolid, Spain

Purpose or Objective

Dose escalation by the combined therapy between high-

dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) plus external beam

radiation therapy (EBRT) has reported excellent clinical

results, strongly supporting its use in high-risk patients.

We present our experience of dose escalation using a

single-fraction HDRB for intermediate- and high-risk

prostate cancer.

Material and Methods

From August 2010 to September 2015, 332 patients with

National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate-

(n=59) and high-risk (n=273) prostate cancer were

evaluated. Median age was 71 years (range 46-84). The

staging was performed via magnetic resonance imaging

(MRI) in every case, as is showed in table1. Patients

underwent a single-fraction HDRB boost of 15 Gy (n=242)

or 9-9.5 Gy (n=90) if seminal vesicles were infiltrated using

real-time TRUS based planning. Four gold fiducials

markers were implanted immediately after HDRB. EBRT 46

Gy/23fx or 60 Gy/30fx was performed 4 weeks after HDRB

to patients who received 15 Gy and 9-9.5 Gy HDRB boost

respectively. All patients received EBRT by Volumetric Arc

Therapy (VMAT) with imaging guided by CBCT. A total of

148 patients (45%) received a dose of 46 Gy to the pelvis

according to the risk pelvic node involvement by ROACH

formula. The constraints recommended by GEC/ESTRO

have been respected in all brachytherapy plans (Rectum

D

2cc

≤ 75Gy; urethra D10 ≤120 Gy EQD

2

). GI and GU

toxicities were reported according to CTAE v4.0. In all,

290 patients (87%) received neo-concomitant and adjuvant

androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were followed

prospectively and the Phoenix definition was used to

assess biochemical failure