Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  392 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 392 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S377

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

.

Results

The median follow-up was 33 months (range 2-68). The 5-

year biochemical disease-free survival (bFDS) rate was 90%

and overall survival (OS) was 86%. Acute genitourinary

(GU) toxicity grade 1 and 2 were 37% and 12% respectively,

but only 8 patients (2.4%) experienced acute urinary

retention (Grade 3). Acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity

grade 1 and 2 were 16% and 6% respectively. No grade 3 or

4 GI toxicity was observed. Late GU toxicity ≥ grade 3

included 7 patients (2.1%), and the incidence of late GI

toxicity ≥ grade 3 was 1% (3 patients) compatible with

rectal radiation proctopathy, as is showed in figure1.

Conclusion

Dose escalation with a single-fraction HDRB is feasible and

well tolerated. The profile of acute and late toxicity is

acceptable, although a longer follow-up is needed to

evaluate long-term outcome and toxicities.

PO-0727 Acute intestinal toxicity after whole-pelvis

IMRT for prostate cancer from the patient’s

perspective

B. Noris Chiorda

1

, E. Garibaldi

2

, B. Saracino

3

, D. Cante

4

,

B. Avuzzi

5

, E. Villa

6

, J.M. Waskiewicz

7

, M. Gaetano

8

, F.

Munoz

9

, G. Girelli

10

, C. Sini

11

, T. Rancati

5

, F. Badenchini

5

,

C. Bianconi

1

, C. Fiorino

11

, C. Cozzarini

1

1

San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Radiotherapy, Milan,

Italy

2

Istituto di Candiolo - Fondazione del Piemonte per

l'Oncologia IRCCS, Radiotherapy, Candiolo TO, Italy

3

Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Regina Elena", Radiotherapy,

Rome, Italy

4

Ospedale Civile ASL TO4, Radiotherapy, Ivrea, Italy

5

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori,

Radiotherapy, Milan, Italy

6

Humanitas Gavazzeni, Radiotherapy, Bergamo, Italy

7

Comprensorio Sanitario di Bolzano, Radioterapia,

Bolzano, Italy

8

Centro Aktis, Radiotherapy, Marano NA, Italy

9

Ospedale Regionale 'U. Parini' - AUSL Valle d'Aosta,

Radiotherapy, Aosta, Italy

10

Ospedale degli Infermi ASL BI - Biella, Radiotherapy,

Biella, Italy

11

San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Medical Physics,

Milan, Italy

Purpose or Objective

The aim of this study was to thoroughly analyze patient-

reported acute intestinal toxicity (IT) from whole-pelvis

RT delivered by means of modern IMRT techniques (IM-

WPRT).

Material and Methods

A multi-Institutional, observational study registered at

ClinicalTrials.gov was started in 2014 with the aim of

assessing Intestinal, Hematological and Urinary toxicity

from IM-WPRT for prostate cancer. Acute IT is evaluated

by means of the 10 items of the Inflammatory Bowel

Disease Questionnaire pertaining to the Bowel Domain

(IBDQ-B) administered to patients (pts) at baseline and at

RT mid-point and end: bowel movements (item #1), loose

bowel movements (#5), abdominal cramps (#9) and pain

(#13), gas passage (#17), bloating (#20), rectal bleeding

(#22), urgency to defecate (#24), accidental soiling (#26),

nausea and feeling sick (#29). Each item is scored on a 1-

7 point scale (most severe symptoms=lower scores).

Analyses were performed on the worst variations (Δ) of

each item between baseline and RT mid-point or end. This

analysis pertains to 242 pts with complete data at all the

3 time intervals, treated with adjuvant, salvage or radical

intent (n=91, 104 and 47, respectively), with VMAT,

Tomotherapy or static-field IMRT (n=122, 90 and 30,

respectively). RT was delivered at conventional (CF, 1.7-2

Gy/fr,n=92) or moderate hypo-fractionation (HYPO, 2.15-

2.65 Gy/fr, median 2.35 Gy/fr, n=114). The median EQD2

(for α/β=3) to prostatic bed and prostate were 72.6 and

77 Gy, respectively; pelvic lymph-nodes/pelvic lymph-

nodal area were always treated with conventional

fractionation (range 50.4-56.1 Gy, median 51.8; daily

dose: 1.7-2 Gy/fr).

Results

Overall, IM-WPRT was well tolerated, with a median Δ with

respect to baseline of -2 points for item #1, of -1 points

for items # 5, 17 and 24, and 0 for the 6 remaining items

(Table 1, Fig. 1). Moreover, the consequent impairment of

Emotional, Social and Systemic Domains evaluated by the

IBDQ was exceptionally mild (Table 1). Nevertheless, the

Δ of all the 10 IBDQ-B at RT end with respect to baseline

was always statistically significant (p≤0.02) at the Analysis

of Variance (ANOVA). Interestingly, in the 134 patients

with complete data at 1 year, ANOVA highlighted a

persisting, significant (p≤0.04) Δ with respect to baseline