Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  402 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 402 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S387

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

particular care, with the aid of surgical reports and

diagnostic imaging.

PO-0743 Retransplantation of bony autografts

sterilized by extracorporal high dose irradiation

L. Saleh-Ebrahimi

1

, A. Klein

2

, Y. Bakhshai

2

, F. Roeder

1,3

,

A. Baur-Melnyk

4

, T. Knösel

5

, L.H. Lindner

6

, V. Jansson

2

,

H.R. Dürr

2

1

LMU Munich, Department of Radiation Oncology,

Munich, Germany

2

LMU Munich, Department of Orthopedics, Munich,

Germany

3

German Cancer Research Center DKFZ, Department of

Molecular Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany

4

LMU Munich, Department of Radiology, Munich,

Germany

5

LMU Munich, Department of Pathology, Munich,

Germany

6

LMU Munich, Department of Internal Medicine, Munich,

Germany

Purpose or Objective

Limb-sparing resection of bone tumors requires

reconstruction of the bony defect. Retransplantation of

the resected bone after sterilisation might be an

alternative to prothetic implants especially in cases with

diaphyseal defects. Here we report our experience with

this technique using extracorporal high dose irradiation to

sterilize the resected bone.

Material and Methods

Extracorporal irradiation and retransplantation was used

in 20 patients (21 lesions) between 2005 and 2015. 13

patients were male and median age was 37 years (10-83)

with 4 patients <18 years. Main histologies were Ewing

sarcoma (7 pts), Osteosarcoma (5) and metastasis (5).

Lesions were located mainly in the lower limb (femur

n=12, tibia n=6). After resection and curettage, the

tumor-bearing bone was packed into a double sterile bag

and transported to the radiation oncology department. To

minimize any built-up effect, the bag was wrapped with

flap material and placed beneath the LINAC with the

lowest possible distance to the head, usually on a tray in

the accessory slot. After irradiation with 300 Gy in ap/pa

technique, the bone was brought back to the operation

room and retransplanted.

Results

Median follow up was 33 months (6-129) in the entire

cohort and 39 months in survivors. Retransplantation was

possible in all patients. An additional fibula augmentation

was used in 14 lesions. Surgical revisions (median n=2,

range 1-8) were needed in 12 lesions (57%) due to

complications or pseudoarthrosis. Complete integration of

the irradiated autograft was finally achieved in 17 of 19

possible lesions (89%). One patient failed with active

pseudoarthrosis and in one patient a prothetic implant was

needed secondarily due to a fractured pseudoarthrosis. In

two patients with retransplantation of the whole

irradiated calcaneus, integration was formally not

possible. Median time to complete integration was 10

months (4-35 months). Local control inside the graft and

in the affected limb was achieved in 100% and 95% of the

patients, respectively. One patient developed recurrence

outside the replanted graft, probably due to seeding

because of fracture hematoma. Four patients have died,

resulting in a 5-year overall survival of 68 %.

Conclusion

High dose extracorporal irradiation is an effective and safe

method to sterilize bony autografts during a

retransplantation procedure. Local control is achieved in

95%-100%. Complications with the need for surgical

revisions occur frequently resulting in a prolonged healing

process in more than half of the patients. However,

successful integration of the sterilized autografts is finally

achieved in the vast majority (roughly 90%).

Retransplantation after extracorporal irradiation seems to

be a very promising alternative to prothetic implants

especially in the treatment of diaphyseal or

metadiasphyseal lesions.

PO-0744 Brachytherapy and external beam radiation

therapy after re-excision surgery in soft tissue sarcomas

A. Cortesi

1,2

, A. Arcelli

1,3

, L. Giaccherini

1

, A. Galuppi

1

, V.

Panni

1

, A. Zamagni

1

, S. Bisello

1

, F. Romani

4

, G. Bianchi

5

,

S. Campagnoni

5

, M. Gambarotti

6

, G. Ghigi

2

, S.

Micheletti

7

, G. Macchia

8

, F. Deodato

8

, S. Cilla

9

, G.P.

Frezza

3

, A.G. Morganti

1

, S. Cammelli

1

1

University of Bologna, Radiation Oncology Center-

Department of Experimental- Diagnostic and Specialty

Medicine - DIMES, Bologna, Italy

2

Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura

dei Tumori IRST- IRCCS, Radiotherapy Department,

Ravenna, Italy

3

Ospedale Bellaria, Radiotherapy Department, Bologna,

Italy

4

S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital- University of Bologna,

Medical Physic Unit, Bologna, Italy

5

Rizzoli Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Oncology,

Bologna, Italy

6

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Department of Pathology,

Bologna, Italy

7

Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura

dei Tumori IRST- IRCCS, Radiotherapy Department,

Meldola, Italy

8

Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura “Giovanni Paolo II”,

Radiotherapy Unit, Campobasso, Italy

9

Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura “Giovanni Paolo II”,

Medical Physics Unit, Campobasso, Italy

Purpose or Objective

To evaluate outcomes in patients with primary high grade

soft tissue sarcomas (STS), treated with perioperative

brachytherapy (BRT) and adjuvant external beam

radiation therapy (EBRT) after re-excision of the tumor

bed, post unplanned surgery.

Material and Methods

The primary aim of this retrospective study was to analyse

local control (LC). Secondary objective were metastasis-

free survival (MFS), diseases-free survival (DFS) and

overall survival (OS) in a large patient population. BRT

delivered dose was 20 Gy (15-22 Gy) using Low Dose-Rate

or Pulsed Dose-Rate technique. EBRT was delivered with

3D-technique using multiple beams; the median

prescribed dose was 46 Gy to the PTV (range 40-60 Gy),

conventionally fractionated. Univariate analysis was

estimated according to Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank

test.

Results

From 2000 to 2011, 121 patients (median age: 50 years,

range 16-86; median follow-up: 54 months), affected by

primary high grade STS, underwent unplanned surgery, re-

excision of the tumor bed (radicalization) within a

maximum of 3-6 months from the previous surgery,

perioperative BRT and adjuvant EBRT. Seventeen patients

(14.0%) developed metastases, 7 patients (5.8%) relapsed

and 9 out of 121 patients died (7.4%). Five-year LC and OS

were 93.0% and 91.6%, respectively. At univariate analysis

higher 5-year DFS and OS were recorded in patients with

lower- limb tumors vs upper-limb and trunk STS (p: 0.053

and 0.041, respectively). Although it wasn’t detected any

statistical significance related to histologies. Younger

patients (< median age) showed improved 5-year LC (97.9%

vs 88.1%, p: 0.052), 5-year DFS (88.9% vs 73.9%, p: 0.034)

and 5-year OS (96.5% vs 86.6%, p: 0.093).

Conclusion

The combination of BRT and EBRT is able to achieve

satisfactory results, with a high local control rate and

overall survival. Prospective studies on combined modality

treatment in the adjuvant setting of STS after re-excision

surgery or inadequate excision are still needed to improve

the results in STS of the trunk and limb.