Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  613 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 613 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S597

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

A database of HNSCC patients recruited to the Cancer

Research UK VoxTox study between March 2013 and

January 2016 was reviewed. All patients had been treated

on TomoTherapy units, according to local protocol.

Inclusion criteria for this sub-study were: full details of

treatment protocol (RT and chemo) available, adequate

follow-up, confirmed residual or loco-regionally relapsed

disease, and diagnostic quality imaging of this disease

(including MRI, PET/CT, CT) available for review. This

gave a final cohort of 12.

Imaging confirming relapse or residual disease was

uploaded to virtual simulation software (Prosoma 3.3),

where an in-built DIR package was used to fuse these

images with the planning CT and treatment dose-cube.

Residual/relapsed disease was contoured on the relapse

imaging, named rGTV, and the volume of this structure

recorded. Contours describing the 95% isodose of 65Gy,

60Gy, 55Gy and 54Gy where relevant were generated. For

each case, the proportion of rGTV covered by these

isodoses and the treatment PTV and CTVs were recorded

(labelled ‘V’). Relapses were classified according to the

95% isodose of prescription dose contour: ‘in-field’ V >

75%, ‘marginal’ V – 25-75%, ‘out of field’ V < 25%.

Results

Case details are given in Table 1. Oral cavity primary

disease accounted for 15% of cases in the original cohort

available for review (prior to exclusions), but half of

patients who relapsed loco-regionally. Mean time to

relapse was 18 weeks (Std. error +/- 2.4 weeks). 10 of 12

patients (83%) had residual or relapsed disease ipsilateral

to the primary site. 2 (both lateral tongue SCCs who

underwent primary surgery followed by RT +/- chemo to

the primary site and ipsilateral neck) relapsed early (8 and

20 weeks respectively) in the contralateral, un-irradiated

neck.

Figure 1 describes the volume of rGTV covered by

pertinent isodose contours and target CTV/PTVs.

According to our criteria, 9 of 12 relapses were in-field

(75%), 1 (8.3%) was marginal and 2 (16.7%) were in

deliberately un-irradiated contralateral neck nodes as

described.

Conclusion

Oral cavity tumours appeared at highest risk of relapse in

our cohort. Using DIR to map disease relapse to treatment

volumes and dose, we found most relapsed HNSCC (75%)

occurred within the high dose volume, in keeping with

previous studies, and suggesting that unfavourable biology

rather than inadequate RT is the predominant reason for

loco-regional HNSCC relapse. Our results will be used to

inform review of our neck irradiation policy, particularly

for SCCs of the oral cavity.

EP-1097 P16 expression: a predictive marker for

treatment-related outcomes in oropharyngeal cancer

patients?

A. Modesto

1

, T. Galissier

2

, A. Lusque

3

, E. Uro-Coste

2

, J.

Delord

4

, A. Laprie

1

, J. Sarini

5

, P. Graff

1

, P. Vergez

5

, M.

Rives

1

1

Institut Universitaire du Cancer, radiation therapy,

Toulouse, France

2

Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Pathology, Toulouse,

France

3

Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Biostatistics, Toulouse,

France

4

Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Medical Oncology,

Toulouse, France

5

Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Head and Neck

Surgery, Toulouse, France

Purpose or Objective

Treatment strategies in oropharyngeal squamous cell

carcinomas (OSCC) consist in either surgery followed by

adjuvant

radio(chemo)therapy

or

definitive

radio(chemo)therapy. P16 overexpression (p16+) is

considered as a surrogate marker for HPV-induced tumors

that are associated with improved outcome whichever

treatment modality is considered in comparison with p16

negative (p16-) OSCC. To date no predictive factors are

known to guide treatment decision.

Material and Methods

All consecutive patients treated for an OSCC with a

curative intend at a single tertiary cancer center between

2009 and 2013 were eligible to this study. P16 status was

determined by immunochemistry and centrally reviewed.

Late toxicities incidence ie: dysphagia, xerostomia,

painful shoulder, osteoradionecrosis or nerve paralysis

were registrated and graded according to CTCAE v4 in

patients alive without loco-regional evolution at least 6

months after treatment completion. Three-year disease

free survival (DFS) and late severe toxicity occurrence

were compared according to p16 expression and

treatment modality: initial surgical treatment or

definitive radio(chemo)therapy.

Results

Among the 167 patients included in this study, 77 (44%)

presented a tumoral p16 overexpression (p16+). Initial