Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  663 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 663 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S647

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

metastases (p-value 0.008). Finally, 86% of patients with

local failure had distant progression versus only 19% in

cases without local failure (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

According to current findings, pre-SABR SUV max and

mean seem to predict early response in lung SABR for

oligometastases.

EP-1207 Outcomes and prognostic factors in solitary

brain metastasis from small cell lung cancer

D. Bernhardt

1

, S. Adeberg

1

, F. Bozorgmehr

2

, J. Kappes

3

,

J. Hoerner-Rieber

1

, L. Koenig

1

, J. Debus

1

, M. Thomas

2

, A.

Unterberg

4

, F. Herth

3

, C.P. Heussel

5

, M. Steins

2

, S.

Rieken

1

1

University Hospital of Heidelberg, Department of

Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany

2

University Hospital of Heidelberg, Department of

Thoracic Oncology- Thoraxklinik- Translational Lung

Research Centre Heidelberg TLRC-H, Heidelberg,

Germany

3

University Hospital of Heidelberg, Department of

Pneumology- Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg, Germany

4

University Hospital of Heidelberg, Department of

Neurosurgery, Heidelberg, Germany

5

University Hospital of Heidelberg, Diagnostic and

Interventional Radiology with Nuclear Medicine-

Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg, Germany

Purpose or Objective

Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) was historically the

standard of care for patients with brain metastases (BM)

from small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Even though, for

patients from other solid tumours, locally ablative

treatments are standard of care for patients with 1-4 BM.

The objective of this analysis was to find prognostic

factors influencing overall survival (OS) and progression-

free survival (nPFS) in SCLC patients with solitary BM (SBM)

treated with WBRT.

Material and Methods

We identified 52 patients in our cancer center database

that had histologically confirmed SCLC and contrast

enhanced magnet resonance imaging (MRI) or computed

tomography (CT) confirmed SBM between 2006 and 2015.

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed for survival

analyses. For comparison of survival curves, Log-rank

(Mantel-Cox) test was used. Univariate Cox proportional-

hazards ratios (HRs) were used to assess the influence of

cofactors on OS and nPFS.

Results

The median OS after WBRT was 5 months and the median

nPFS after WBRT was 16 months. Patients who received

surgery prior to WBRT had a significantly longer median OS

of 19 months compared to 5 months in the group receiving

only WBRT (p=0.03; HR 2.24; 95 % CI 1.06-4.73). Patients

with synchronous disease had a significantly longer OS

compared to patients with metachronous BM (6 months vs.

3 months, p=0.005; HR 0.27; 95 % CI 0.11-0.68). Univariate

analysis for OS did show a statistically significant effect

for metachronous disease (HR 2.84; 95% CI 1.26-6.38;

p=0.012), initial response to first-line chemotherapy (HR

0.54; 95% CI 0.30-0.97; p=0.04) and surgical resection (HR

0.25; 95 % CI 0.07-0.83; p=0.024). NPFS was significantly

affected by metachronous disease in univariate analysis

(HR 14.84; 95% CI 1.46-150.07; p=0.02).

Conclusion

This analysis revealed that surgery followed by WBRT leads

to an improved OS in patients with SBM in SCLC. Further,

synchronous disease and response to initial chemotherapy

appeared to be major prognostic factors. We propose that

locally ablative treatments in combination with WBRT for

SBM in SCLC should be considered for therapy. Surgery

followed by WBRT should be favored in patients with

unknown primary, when pathologic confirmation is

required or in patients with large single brain metastasis

causing mass effect. The value of WBRT, SRS or surgery

alone or the combination for patients with limited number

of BM in SCLC must be evaluated in further prospective

clinical trials.

EP-1208 Concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by

stereotactic ablative boost in non small cell lung

cancer

J. Doyen

1

, M. Poudenx

2

, J. Gal

3

, J. Otto

2

, J. Mouroux

4

, B.

Padovani

5

, A. Leysalle

1

, C. Guerder

6

, E. Chamorey

3

, P.

Bondiau

1

1

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Radiation Oncology, Nice,

France

2

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Medical Oncology, Nice,

France

3

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Statistics, Nice, France

4

CHU Teaching hospital, Thoracic surgery, Nice, France

5

CHU Teaching hospital, Radiology, Nice, France

6

Hôpital de la Croix Rouge, Radiation Oncology, Toulon,

France

Purpose or Objective

The randomized phase III RTOG 7301 trial failed to

demonstrate a survival advantage by increasing radiation

dose until 74 Gy in locally advanced non small cell lung

cancer

(NSCLC)

treated

by

concomitant

chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and found that mean dose to the

heart correlated independently with overall survival (OS).

By increasing the dose to the tumor with stereotactic

ablative radiotherapy (SABR) one could lead to a greater

dose to the target while decreasing the dose to the heart

and could improve outcome. A phase I trial was conducted

to firstly demonstrate feasibility of this strategy.

Material and Methods

After 2 induction cycles with cisplatinum (75 mg/m²) and

docetaxel (75 mg/m²) CRT used the same regimen (25

mg/m²) in a weekly basis and delivered 46 Gy in 23

sessions; then 3 consecutive fractions of 7 Gy were given

with SABR technique with increasing of 1 Gy per session

for next dose level (6 dose level; dose escalation with

TITE-CRM method). Patients were eligible for the

treatment if target volume after 46 Gy was < 6 cm.

Results

Twenty-six patients (pts) were treated between March

2010 and June 2015; number of pts for dose level 1, 2, 3,

4, 5 and 6 were respectively of 3, 4, 3, 3, 9 and 4. Median

age was of 65.4 years (46-81) with 7 female, 19 male, 1

stage I, 1 stage IIB, 14 stage IIIA, 7 stage IIIB and 3 stage

IV disease (oligometastatic). With a median follow-up of

37.1 months (1.7-60.7), limiting toxicities (grade 3 to 5)

were as follow: G4 oesophagitis (fistula) at dose level 5;

grade 5 (hemoptysis) at dose level 6. Patients mainly

presented with grade 1-2 asthenia (n=12) or alveolitis

(n=9). There were one complete response (3.8%), 17

partial responses (65.4%) and 7 stabilizations (26.9%). The

2-years local control, metastasis-free survival and overall

survival were respectively of 70.3%, 44.5% and 50.8%.

Conclusion

The maximal tolerated dose was 3 X 11 Gy after 46 Gy

(Biological Effective Dose: 115.3 Gy) and could be tested

in a phase II trial.

EP-1209 SBRT for lung metastases: retrospective

analyses of tumor control and toxicity with a lower BED.

Y. Crempe

1

, I.P. barbosa

1

, C.D.O. Rodrigues

1

, E. Gil

1

, P.H.

Zanuncio

1

, P.L. Moraes

1

, l. Fagundes

1

, R. Ferrigno

1

1

hospital beneficencia portuguesa de sao paulo, radiation

oncology, sao paulo, brazil

Purpose or Objective

Many fractionations have been effective on tumor control

of primary lung cancer or metastatic lung lesions, most

with BED

10

> 100Gy

10

. The aim of this series is to test safety

and effectivity of a dose fractionation with a lower BED in

the treatment of lung metastatic disease.

Material and Methods