Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  667 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 667 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S651

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

about the response of the OARs to the radiation, and

should be prospectively evaluated.

EP-1217 Non-small cell lung cancer invading the

vertebra: what is the optimal strategy for radiation?

S. Appel

1

, J. Goldstein

1

, Z. Symon

1

, Y. Lawrence

1

, M. Ben

aiun

1

, N. Honig

1

, T. Rabin

1

1

Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Radiation Oncology,

Ramat Gan, Israel

Purpose or Objective

Non-small cell lung cancer that invades the vertebra (T4)

may cause significant morbidities if uncontrolled locally

with limited options for salvage re-irradiation. The spinal

foramina and vertebral body are sites of potential tumor

invasion and sparing them may compromise local tumor

control probabilities. In our institution, we incorporated

the strategy of including the entire vertebra and the spinal

canal to the allowed dose in two strategies: shrinking

fields and integrated boost.

We hypothesized that treating with integrated boost

including the spine canal and the vertebral body will result

in higher tumor BED than treatment with shrinking fields

with off spine boost.

Material and Methods

we retrospectively reviewed 14 cases that were T4 and

treated with radiation therapy in our institute and

included the spine and vertebra, during the years 2013-

2016. We searched the radiation plans for mean dose to

GTV, spine and fraction size. We calculated the

biologically effective doses (BED) per the linear quadratic

model, for the GTV using α/β=10 and for the spine using

α/β=3. In the shrinking fields two calculations were

performed for each step, to account for the different

doses to the spine.

Results

Shrinking field:

( 4 patients) median prescription dose was

59 Gy (55-66 Gy) in 2 Gy per fraction in 29 (26-33) fractions

Median GTV dose was 61.3 Gy (57-68.7Gy). The maximal

dose to spine with the composite planes, including the exit

dose from the boost plan was median of 50.6 Gy (48.4-53.5

Gy). Median BED to PTV was 71Gy (68.1-79.2Gy) GTV was

74.3 Gy (66.6-83 Gy) and to the spine was 82.2 Gy (75.3-

86.4 Gy)

Integrated boost

: ( 10 patients) median prescription dose

was 61.6 Gy (54-66 Gy) in 2.21 Gy per fraction (1.96-2.28

Gy) in 28 (28-33) fractions. The median GTV dose was 62.6

Gy (55-64.7 Gy). The median maximal dose to the spine

was 50 Gy (47.8-52.7Gy), in 1.8 Gy per fraction (1.6-1.9

Gy). Median BED to PTV was 75.2 Gy (64.8-79.2 Gy) GTV

was 76.4 Gy (66.6-78.5 Gy), and the median BED to the

spine 79.2 Gy (75-85.9 Gy).

1.

example of integrated boost treatment color wash. the

GTV is bold red and is recieving mean dose of 63 Gy .. the

outer red delineates the elective dose and includes the

spinal canal and the adjacent vertebra.higher dose is

manipulated inside the GTV, to allow higher BED while

elective dose is prescrived to the high risk elective area.

)

2.

Table 1: Comparison between treatment strategies:

Shrinking fields vs. Integrated boost: Doses prescribed to

the PTV, actual doses to the GTV and maximal doses to

the spine, and the calculated doses to the GTV and the

spine according to the linear quadratic model.

Conclusion

Integrated boost strategy resulted in modestly higher BED

to the PTV and GTV than shrinking fields, and lower BED

to the spine. Thus, the integrated boost strategy should

be preferred.

EP-1218 Prognostic Values of Tumor Markers in Lung

Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive

Chemoradiotherapy

J.H. Chung

1

, J.S. Kim

1

1

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Department

of Radiation Oncology, Seongnam-si, Korea Republic of

Purpose or Objective

Prognostic value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen

(CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC),

cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (Cyfra 21-1) and

neuron specific enolase (NSE) has been investigated in

patients with early or advanced lung cancer. However, the

role of these markers in patients undergoing concurrent

chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for inoperable lung cancer is

unclear.

Material and Methods

In this retrospective study, 179 patients (154 men and 25

women; mean age, 62.2±9.7 years) with inoperable lung

cancer underwent definitive CCRT at our institution from

2003 to 2014. Histologic classification was as follows:

adenocarcinoma 37 (21%), squamous cell carcinoma 62

(35%), other non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) 6 (3%),

and small cell carcinoma 74 (41%). Age, gender, histology,

tumor diameter, clinical N stage, and pre- and post-CCRT

serum CEA, SCC, Cyfra 21-1, and NSE levels were chosen

as study variables.