Previous Page  102 / 201 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 102 / 201 Next Page
Page Background

June 2017

7-1

City of Morgan Hill

Water System Master Plan

2017

City of Morgan Hill

7.0

CHAPTER 7 - EVALUATION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

This section presents a summary of the domestic water system evaluation and identifies

improvements needed to mitigate existing deficiencies, as well as improvements needed to

expand the system and service growth.

7.1 OVERVIEW

The calibrated hydraulic model was used for evaluating the distribution system for capacity

deficiencies during peak hour demand and during maximum day demands in conjunction with fire

flows. Since the hydraulic model was calibrated for extended period simulations, the analysis

duration was established at 24 hours for analysis.

The criteria used for evaluating the capacity adequacy of the domestic water distribution system

facilities (transmission mains, storage reservoirs, and booster stations) was discussed and

summarized in the System Performance and Design Criteria chapter.

7.2 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS

The fire flow analysis consisted of using the maximum day demand in the hydraulic model and

applying hypothetical fire flows. The magnitude and duration of each fire flow was based on the

governing land use type within proximity to the fire location. The criterion for fire flows was also

summarized in the System Performance and Design Criteria chapter.

The hydraulic model indicates that the City’s existing distribution system performed adequately

during the fire flow analysis. Areas where the City water system did not meet the fire flow criteria

are documented on

Figure 7.1

. The available fire flow at the City’s residual pressure criteria of 20

psi is summarized on

Figure 7.2

. It should be noted that a majority of the service connections in

the eastern foothills are unable to meet the pressure requirements under fire flow conditions. A

majority of the distribution system serving this area is comprised of 6-inch and 8-inch water

pipelines with minimal looping. It is recommended that as pipeline replacements occur, 6-inch

pipelines be upsized to 8-inch pipelines to reduce the headloss and velocity impacts to this area.

Additionally, where the cost is not prohibitive, it is recommended that looped connections be

constructed for reliability.

Improvements to mitigate specific fire flow deficiencies are discussed below and include a

corresponding coded identifier, which is consistent with the capital improvements chapter:

NH-P2.

Replace approximately 950 feet of 4-inch water main from Del Monte Avenue to

Monterey Road along Spring Avenue with 8-inch water main.

BR-P5:

Replace an 8-inch pip with a new 10-inch pipeline in Mission View Drive between

Cochrane Road and 2,100 feet northwest of Cochrane Road.