Previous Page  95 / 201 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 95 / 201 Next Page
Page Background

June 2017

6-3

City of Morgan Hill

Water System Master Plan

6.4 MODEL CALIBRATION

Calibration is intended to instill a level of confidence in the pressures and flows that are simulated.

Calibration generally consists of comparing model predictions to field measured results and

making necessary adjustments.

6.4.1

Calibration Plan and SCADA

In order to calibrate the hydraulic model pressure SCADA data was collected for points throughout

the water distribution system, as well as water level data for the City’s storage reservoirs. City

staff provided 15-minute pressure data for each groundwater well and booster station as well as

15-minute water level data for the City’s storage reservoirs, for a portion of the month of August

2014. The locations that were included in the calibration for tanks, booster stations, and wells

were identified on

Figure 6.1

.

In addition, pressure loggers were installed throughout the system in an effort to enhance the

calibration effort and document system conditions away from the vertical infrastructure. Three

pressure loggers were placed at various intersections for a one-week period before moving to new

locations. In addition to these three rotating pressure loggers, one pressure loggers was placed at

a fixed point for the duration of the pressure logging program. The periods of installation for the

pressure loggers are summarized on

Table 6.1

, while

Figure 6.2

documents the points used in

the calibration of the hydraulic model.

6.4.2

EPS Calibration

Calibration can be performed for steady state conditions or for extended period simulations (EPS).

In steady state calibration, the model is compared to field monitoring results consisting of a single

value, such as a single hydrant test. EPS calibration consists of comparing model predictions to

diurnal operational changes in the water system.

The calibration process for the hydraulic model was extensive, and involved an iterative process

which resulted with satisfactory comparisons between the field measurements and the hydraulic

model predictions at each well site and the water tank. The calibration results were graphically

summarized for each site and included in

Appendix A

.

Representative extracts from

Appendix A

are shown on

Figure 6.3

for calibration points at Diana

Well Number 1 and the Edmundson tank.

6.4.3

Use of the Calibrated Model

The calibrated hydraulic model was used as an established benchmark in the capacity evaluation

of the existing water distribution system. The model was also used to identify improvements

necessary for mitigating existing system deficiencies and for accommodating future growth. This

valuable investment will continue to prove its value to the City as future planning issues or other

operational conditions surface. It is recommended that the model be maintained and updated with

recent construction to preserve its integrity.