6 / 18
6 |
Ten Year Network Development Plan 2015 Annex C 1
EE (ESTONIA)
Final gas demand
The differences between Scenario A and the Scenario B are limited to the annual
forecasts, while the figures for the 1-day Design Case and the 14-day Uniform Risk
are the same for both scenarios.
Power generation – general methodology
The Estonian electricity sector has the peculiarity of having oil shale, and not coal,
as the main competing technology for gas-fired power generation. The general
methodology has been applied, by substituting oil for coal-fired installed capacities.
ES (SPAIN)
Final gas demand
Scenarios A and B have been developed by Enagas, based on different evolutions
of GDP (one more optimistic and the other one pessimistic).
Power generation – general methodology
Enagas has used different minimum and maximum gas and coal-fired power
generation levels for Visions 1 and 3, rather than using installed capacity levels, in
order to provide a clearer differentiation of the two ENTSO-E visions.
Power generation – Scenario by TSO
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
DAILY PEAK
GWh/d
653.77
893.61
908.09
871.36
821.51
ANNUALLY DEMAND UPPER
GWh/y
98,531 138,915
157,355
158,063
160,120
ANNUALLY DEMAND MEDIUM GWh/y
80,274 109,004
123,493
124,049
125,666
ANNUALLY DEMAND LOWER
GWh/y
56,018
69,147
93,522
102,426
113,339
FI (FINLAND)
Final gas demand
The TSO submitted the inputs for the general methodology. No further comments
have been reported.
Power generation – general methodology
The TSO submitted the inputs for the general methodology. No further comments
have been reported.