Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  108 / 140 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 108 / 140 Next Page
Page Background

Global Marketplace

www.read-tpt.com

106

September 2013

Navigant believes that the time and expense required to

license new reactor technology in the US is a primary reason

why many industry stakeholders believe that initial SMR

deployments will happen elsewhere: likely in China, which has

one of the most advanced SMR development programmes in

the world.

There are SMR deployment programmes currently

underway in the US, and the market drivers may indeed

surmount the barriers. But, with the power markets in the US

having been radically changed by the development of shale

gas, American nuclear operators are feeling the pressure.

Dominion Resources cited unfavourable economics in the

shutdown of its Kewaunee reactor in Wisconsin in May. And

Duke Energy said in February that it would not restart Crystal

River 3, in Florida. The deciding factor was the high cost of

fixing mechanical problems at the plant.

Of related interest . . .

Nearly two and a half years after the Fukushima disaster,

and with all but two of the 50 nuclear reactors in Japan off

line since the crisis, Japanese utility companies have moved

closer to restarting the reactors that once supplied about a

third of the nation’s power.

On 7 July, when new, stricter (and now compulsory) safety

requirements took effect, four of the nine Japanese nuclear

plant operators applied for safety inspections by the Nuclear

Regulation Authority for ten reactors at five plants supplying

the regions of Hokkaido, Kansai, Shikoku and Kyushu.

Applications for two reactors at another plant were expected

later in the week. Only those reactors that pass inspection will

be allowed to reopen – possibly early next year.

Nearly all the Japanese utilities owning nuclear power plants

reported huge losses in the last fiscal year due to higher costs

for fuel imports.

Hokkaido Electric Power Co, for example, said that three idled

reactors were costing it $6mn daily. The nuclear operators

have already requested rate hikes or intend to do so.

Germany’s ConergyAG has fallen victim to the global solar

panel price war. The Hamburg-based company – which

specialises in planning and installing photovoltaic systems –

filed for insolvency on 5 July. It has some 1,200 employees.

A recent government report found that about 24,000 jobs –

more than a fifth of all jobs in Germany’s once-burgeoning

solar panel industry – have been lost since 2011.

Solar industry revenue in the country dropped to $9.53bn in

2012 from $15.3bn the year before. The report cited a fall in

prices driven by cheap solar panels made in China.

Dorothy Fabian, Features Editor (USA)