Previous Page  34 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

32

Electricity

+

Control

SEPTEMBER 2017

PLANT MAINTENANCE, TEST + MEASUREMENT

Voluntary versus mandatory reporting

Even if a company has been reporting its green-

house gas emissions for years, e.g. as a CDP

response or for other (strategic) reasons, this

does not mean that these companies are set up

for compliance to The Regulations. The extent to

which carbon inventories need to be realigned to

The Regulations depends on the methodology

used for calculating and reporting of greenhouse

gas emissions. National emissions inventories

are often done based on IPCC guidelines ‘to up-

date and maintain a National Greenhouse Gas In-

ventory’. At company level, the GHG Protocol is

typically the standard used for the establishment

of a greenhouse gas inventory. The main differ-

ences between these protocols are summed up

below and are areas that corporates will need to

reassess in order to align their voluntary carbon

management system to the new Regulations as

introduced on 3 April this year.

• Greenhouse gas emissions sources: The Reg-

ulations classify emissions sources by the

activity generating the emissions; The GHG

Protocol uses a sectoral classification for the

identification of emissions sources.Why is this

important? Because the category of a green-

house gas emissions source influences:

-

The methodology selected for the inventory

-

The selection and therefore the level of

accuracy of the emission-factor

• Global Warming Potential (GWP) values: The

Regulations stipulate that data providers are

required to use GWP values provided by the

IPCC 3

rd

Assessment Report [6] (https://www.

ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/). The GHG Protocol

prescribes that the GWPs from the IPCC 2

nd

,

3

rd

or 4

th

Assessment Report can be used, as

long as they are referenced correctly and used

consistently. (The global warming potential of

a greenhouse gas refers to the quantity of the

reference gas, i.e. carbon dioxide, required to

having the same impact on global warming as

a unit of the gas in question. For example, if

methane has a global warming potential of 25,

it means that 1 kg of methane has the same

impact on global warming as 25 kg of carbon

dioxide)

• The use of units: Different standards may use

different units: emission-calculation-methods

as per The Regulations follow IPCC Guidelines

and emissions are reported in Gigagrams (Gg).

CDP-submissions are reporting emissions us-

ing tonnes. The GHG Protocol does not specify

which units to use for reporting of emissions

• Reporting period: The Regulations require that

emissions should be reported for a calendar

year (1 January – 31 December), while the

Corporate Standard does not specify the be-

ginning and end of the reporting period as long

as it covers one year

Conclusion

Whether your company has been reporting green-

house gas emissions in the past on a voluntary

basis, or you have not been reporting at all, the

introduction of the National Greenhouse Gas

Emission Reporting Regulations – as of 3 April

2017 – requires for companies to reassess their

carbon-management systems in place.

References

[1]

http://www.wri.org/blog/2015/05/glob-

al-look-mandatory-greenhouse-gas-report-

ing-programs

[2]

www.ghgprotocol.org

[3]

https://www.iso.org/news/2006/03/Ref994.

html

[4]

http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.

php

[5] South Africa’s Intended Nationally Determined

Contribution (INDC)

http://www4.unfccc.int

/

ndcregistry/PublishedDocuments/South%20

Africa%20First/South%20Africa.pdf

[6] Technical Guidelines for Monitoring, Reporting

and Verification of Greenhouse Gases by In-

dustry

<<Author>>

+27 (0) 78 097 0852

silvana@carbon-energy-solutions.co.za www.carbon-energy-solutions.co.za

Silvana Claassen

CES South Africa