Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  38 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

84

JCPSLP

Volume 18, Number 2 2016

Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology

National Disability Insurance Scheme

awareness) of literacy intervention specialists (Moats,

2014). The underlying rationale is that these professionals

must have an explicit knowledge of language structure

to teach their students to become capable readers (see

Moats, 2014). This paper reports the preliminary phase

of a planned longitudinal project aimed at improving

the professional preparation of teachers and speech

pathologists at an Australian university by tracking one

aspect of their language structure knowledge, i.e.,

phonological awareness, during their first semester of study.

Phonological awareness can be defined as the ability

to consciously reflect upon and manipulate the sound

structure of spoken words, at syllable (e / le / phant =

elephant), onset-rime (r / oom = room), and phoneme (c

/ a / t = cat) levels (Stahl & Murray, 1994). Phonological

awareness is crucial for early reading and spelling success

(Stahl & Murray, 1994), and research has clearly established

that a large percentage of children with reading difficulties

demonstrate poor phonological awareness (Carson, Gillon,

& Boustead, 2013). Phonological awareness should not be

confused with phonics. Phonics is a teaching strategy that

addresses how sounds are mapped to letters or symbols

(e.g., what sound does the letter /s/ make?), whereas

phonological awareness refers to the ability to recognise

and manipulate the sounds in spoken language (e.g.,

what sound does the word

snake

start with? or how many

sounds (not letters) in the word

thought?

answer = 3) (e.g.,

Gillon, 2004).

Once children commence their formal school education,

qualified teachers play an important role in young children’s

reading development. Teaching of reading has been and still

is a large focus in curriculum and policy, both in Australia

and internationally (Australian Government, 2005; 2015).

Apart from teachers, speech pathologists address literacy

development with a range of clients – for example when

working with children with spoken language impairment

– who are considered at risk of long-term reading

difficulties (Catts & Hogan, 2003). Considering the fact that

phonological awareness is best taught explicitly, especially

with children who have difficulty in literacy acquisition

(Gillon, 2004), it stands to reason that both teachers and

speech pathologists should display strong phonological

awareness skills themselves. Alarmingly, however, research

suggests that education professionals, including early

childhood educators and primary school teachers generally

present with poor phonological awareness skills (Carroll,

2006; Carroll, Gillon, & McNeill, 2012; Moats, 2003;

Spencer, Schuele, Guillot, & Lee, 2008). Although results

from Carroll et al.’s (2012) and Spencer et al.’s (2008)

Responding to the urgent call to address the

need for appropriate preparation of

professional teachers of reading, this

preliminary investigation examined the

phonological awareness knowledge of

Bachelor of Primary Education and Master of

Speech Pathology students in their first

semester of study before and after their

regular course work. This report outlines the

results of the study and proposes ways of

utilising this information to enhance tertiary

teaching practices, with the ultimate aim of

raising student performance in the area of

phonological awareness.

T

he ability to read is an essential skill in today’s world.

Skilled readers not only need to recognise or decode

the written words, they also need to understand what

those written words mean. Results from the Progress in

International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS; Mullis, Martin,

Foy, & Drucker, 2012) showed that Australian students

scored significantly lower than 21 other countries, with 24%

of the Australian year 4 students performing at the low or

below low international benchmarks (Thomson et al., 2012).

This is concerning and, accordingly, the value of teaching

reading in our primary schools has been well recognised

by the Australian government including departments of

education. In 2005, the Australian government initiated a

National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy and identified

the importance of “teachers adopting an integrated

approach to reading that explicitly teaches phonemic

awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary knowledge and

comprehension” to ensuring reading success (Australian

Government, 2005, p. 11). A decade later, a report titled

Action Now: Classroom Ready Teachers

, also known as

the TEMAG report (Australian Government, 2015), indicated

a continuing necessity for quality and explicit practices

to focus on the teaching of reading in the early years and

throughout schooling.

Ferrari (2015), in a newspaper article summarising

the views of Dr Louisa Moats, noted that “teachers’

lack of basic understanding of how language works is

the underlying problem of teaching reading in schools”.

In the last 20 years, Moats has been a keen advocate

for improving the language-structure knowledge and

skills (e.g., phonological, morphological, and syntactic

The phonological awareness

skills of education and speech

pathology higher education

students during their first

semester of study

Marleen F. Westerveld and Georgina Barton

Marleen F.

Westerveld (top)

and Georgina

Barton

THIS ARTICLE

HAS BEEN

PEER-

REVIEWED

KEYWORDS

HIGHER

EDUCATION

PHONOLOGICAL

AWARENESS

SPEECH

PATHOLOGY

TEACHER

PREPARATION