Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  41 / 132 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 41 / 132 Next Page
Page Background

Transatlantic cable

March 2017

39

www.read-eurowire.com

†

The government wants rms and trade groups to sign up to

“sector deals” allowing them to call for speci c measures to

boost their industries. Examples noted by Mr Sands include

slashing red tape, trade deals to increase exports, support for

skills, and investment in R&D.

On the evidence of the early reports it would appear that the

tech sector is out ahead of the pack.

‘The wall’

If Mr Trump does move ahead on walling

o the USA from Mexico, on-site Mexican

contractors can expect a bonanza

USA President Donald Trump has reiterated his signature

campaign promise to build a wall along the United States border

with Mexico, which stretches some 2,000 miles from California to

Texas. While he has provided few details, if the barrier does go

up it will be one of the biggest infrastructure projects in the USA

in decades. And it will be a boon for contractors.

A

New York Times

analysis of previous failed e orts identi es

as possible winners this time construction rms, high-tech

surveillance companies, and cement manufacturers.

The

Times

’s Danielle Ivory and Julie Creswell noted that,

“in what would be an ironic turn,” these companies notably

include Cemex, Mexico’s largest cement manufacturer, which

analysts note has a USA-based subsidiary that could bid for the

project.

Given the prohibitive cost of shipping heavy rock, concrete and

cement, Cemex – with several plants dotting the border – is a

likely source for building materials.

All contenders for the work will have to do without a clear

idea of the scope of the undertaking. Last year, Massachusetts

Institute of Technology researchers said that a 1,000-mile,

50-foot-high steel-and-concrete wall would run USA taxpayers

about $40 billion.

In the week before the

Times

article was published, the

Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky,

estimated the cost of building the wall at $12 billion to

$15 billion. (“One Certainty of Trump’s Wall: Big Money,”

29

th

January)

“Despite the myriad political and social battles that will surround

it,” wrote Ms Ivory and Ms Creswell, or whether its cost is on the

low or the high end of the range, the wall has caught the eye of

companies and investors eager for a piece of the construction

action. The stocks of several construction companies and

cement and concrete manufacturers jumped after the most

recent wall talk from Mr Trump.

Unintended consequences

According to a

Times

review of spending under the Department

of Homeland Security’s Secure Border Initiative, from 2007 to

2012 Washington paid contractors more than $1.5 billion for

protection of the USA-Mexico border.

Wrote the reporters, in a considerable understatement, “History

would suggest that such e orts can have problematic results.”