Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  23 / 92 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 92 Next Page
Page Background

23

movies. Otto Preminger’s

The Moon is

Blue

(1953) was refused a production seal

of approval by the US censors because

he refused to excise the word “virgin”

from the dialogue. Six years later he made

Anatomy of a Murder

(1959), which created

controversy and was banned in a number

of US cities because the dialogue contained

the words panties, rape and penetration.

Both of Preminger’s films – and his

The

Man with the Golden Arm,

which dealt with

another Hollywood taboo: drug addiction

– were direct assaults on the Production

Code. The media picked up on this and

the Motion Picture Association of America

began to be ridiculed in the press as the

last will and testament of a bygone age and

consequently, completely out of touch with

modern society.

This adverse publicity and subsequent

public curiosity made Preminger’s movies big

hits at the box-office; in fact, bigger hits than

they deserved to be. But then in 1960, Alfred

Hitchcock, who had also been impressed with

the French style of filmmaking, especially the

1955 production 

Les Diaboliques,

imitated

the style and similar plot line for his movie

Psycho

. Paramount gave Hitchcock a very

small budget to work with, because of their

distaste with the source material. They also

deferred most of the net profits to Hitchcock,

believing the film would fail by being refused

the production code’s seal of approval.

Psycho

didn’t fail – it made Hitchcock a fortune.

The huge success of

Psycho –

with its

violence and provocative sexual content,

combined with it being the first American

film ever to show a toilet being flushed

onscreen – fatally weakened the authority of

the MPAA Production Code and paved the

way for the eventual introduction of the film

rating system, still in use today.

The following years saw a marked

increase in the production of relatively low

budget films that would appeal to a younger

audience, by essentially featuring characters

rebelling against any form of authority.

Actor Warren Beatty – turned producer

– persuaded Warner Bros. to finance his

1967 film

Bonnie & Clyde

with a mere $2.5

million budget. The story treatment of

the Depression-era gangster couple, Clyde

Barrow and Bonnie Parker – who went on a

killing spree, holding up banks in the Midwest

– was given an effectively glamorised and

extremely violent treatment, very much in the

style of the French

Nouvelle Vague

. Warner

Bros. had so little faith in the film that initially,

they gave

Bonnie & Clyde

a limited B-movie-

type release, sending it to drive-ins and lesser

theatres. When critics began raving about the

film and thousands of young people showed

up at cinemas clamouring for tickets, it was

better promoted, given a nationwide release,

and went on to gross over $22 million in

domestic rentals. 

A similar reception was given to the

release of the independent Embassy

Pictures production

The Graduate

(1967), starring newcomer Dustin Hoffman.

The film presented a candid look at sex in the

American suburbs, where a nervous young

graduate (Hoffman) is seduced by the older

and rapacious Mrs. Robinson – brilliantly

played by Anne Bancroft. When these two

movies received a combined 17 Academy

Award nominations on top of their huge box-

office returns, the Hollywood establishment

finally came out of its ten-year coma. 

Bonnie & Clyde

and

The

Graduate,

 having shrewdly tapped into

the American counterculture of the

late 1960s, conjointly heralded what

would become known as the Hollywood

Renaissance of the 1970s.

To be continued...

FEATURE

EXTRAS

The banned "panties scene" from Preminger’s

Anatomy of a Murder

(1959)

Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty as

Bonnie & Clyde

(1967)

The brutal final scene from

Bonnie & Clyde

Dustin Hoffman and Anne

Bancroft in

The Graduate

(1967)