GAZETTE
JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1983
Compulsory Registration and
the Irish Church Act, 1869
by
Robert D. Marshall, Solicitor
W
E all live in conditions which are a legacy from
the past. For lawyers, this is undoubtedly true,
but particularly so for conveyancers, the basic
principles of whose craft are regúlated by ancient
statute laws such as
De Donis Conditionalibus
and
Quia Emptores.
In recent years, the extension of the categories of
title which are compulsorily registerable in the Land
Registry under the Registration of Title Act 1964 has
begun to rear its ugly head in urban and rural con-
veyancing, with the result that conveyancers shudder
when they hear of the Irish Church Act of 1869 some,
perhaps, wishing that the Church of Ireland had
never been disestablished.
The purpose of this article is to examine the
circumstances leading to the passing of that Act and
the Sections of the Registration of Title Act 1964
which give rise to the conclusion that the title to large
areas of land hitherto unregistered is compulsorily
registerable. It is not proposed to go into the
Redemption of Rent (Ireland) Act of 1891. Many of
the consequences of that Act for modern convey-
ancers are the same as those of the Irish Church Act
of 1869. In the writer's opinion it would be better to
deal with it under a separate heading.
The Historical Background
The period of almost thirty years between the
passing of the Act of Union and "Catholic Emancipa-
tion" in 1829 was the only period in Irish history of
which it can safely be said that the country was ruled
from Westminster on Westminster's terms.
Thereafter, the degree of integration between the two
countries was gradually reduced, starting with the
religious issue, before turning to the land question
and independence. Strangely enough, it was the
resolution of the religious and land questions which
was to have the most profound effect on Land Law
rather than independence itself.
Catholic Emancipation did not prove to be the
panacea that people expected. During the 1830s,
agrarian violence forced O'Connell to return
repeatedly to the question of the tithe. The tithe was
an incorporeal heréditament, originally in the nature
of an ecclesiastical tax, amounting to one-tenth of the
produce of the land, payable in kind, to support the
Church of Ireland.
The tithes were of two types, lay and ecclesiastical,
but in political terms they were regarded as a tax
payable to support the established Church, to which
the majority of the people did not belong.
1
A policy of converting the tithe into a monetary
payment began with the Tithe Composition Act of
1823 and was continued by a series of Acts until 1836.
This policy of composition was abandoned in 1838 in
favour of a system of rent charges under the Tithe
Rent Charge Act of 1838.
Five years previously, the Ecclesiastical
Commissioners had been established under the
Church Temporalities Act of 1833. Their powers
were to concur in the making of fee farm grants by
fixing a purchase price and to supervise the variation
of rent charges in accordance with the terms of that
Act. Under the Act, persons holding land from the
Church corporations became entitled to expand their
short leases to come into effect
in futuro
and the
akin to the procedure for converting leases for lives
renewable for ever into fee farm grants. The amount
of the rent charged under such leases was related to
the average price of corn which was grown in the area.
For our purposes, the legislation of the 1830s had
the following effects:-
1. t he Ec c l e s i a s t i c al Comm i s s i o n e rs we re
established;
2. land was granted under statutory fee farm grants
at a rent payable to the Church;
3. tithes were converted into monetary payments,
for which the landlord was responsible.
Despite the Church Temporalities Act of 1833,
many ecclesiastical corporations continued to grant
short leases to come into effect
in futuro
and the
writer has seen one dated the 29th December 1870
2
made by the Vicars Choral of the Cathedral Church
of St. Patrick Dublin for a term of twenty years
commencing on the 1st October 1910.
Disestablishment
The next development did not occur until the
passing of the Irish Church Act in 1869 and this,
strangely enough, although stemming from
Gladstone's desire to pacify Ireland, was passed
partly as the result of Fenian agitation in drawing
attention to Ireland's woes and partly as the result of
a political ploy whereby Gladstone forced a
dissolution of Parliament and a general election
which Disraeli, the Prime Minister, lost. The election
was fought specifically on the question of disestab-
lishment of the Church of Ireland.
3
The primary aim of the Irish Church Act was to
dissolve the union between the Church of Ireland
and the Church of England and to sever the con-
nections between Church and State in Ireland. Other
5