Previous Page  269 / 346 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 269 / 346 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

NOVEMBER 1983

noticeable elsewhere in the work — is that much practical

advice is given to the reader.

In chapter 4 the text of Part IV of the 1980 Act is given

and there is an interesting discussion of section 39 which

implies terms as to quality of service. Chapter 5 covers

Misrepresentation and there is a detailed analysis of the

meaning of sections 44 to 46 of the 1980 Act. Chapter 6

deals with Part VI of the 1980 Act but the lack of

treatment of section 47 on unsolicited goods was

disappointing.

While the authors made no criticism of the legislation

in previous chapters they were, in chapter 7, critical of the

method adopted in the Consumer Information Act, 1978,

of merely amending and replacing certain sections of the

Merchandise Marks Act, 1887, and said that it was

unfortunate that the example in the Trade Descriptions

Act, 1968 (U.K.) of replacing and modernising the 1887

Act was not followed. The authors' comments on the

sections of the 1978 Act are interesting and informative.

For example, they point out that the defences prescribed

by section 22 are not available for offences under section 8

concerning misleading advertisements and suggest that

publishers of advertising materials as well as persons

requesting publication may be liable to prosecution under

the Act. The authors refer readers to the equivalent

provisions, if any exist, in the U.K. Act of 1968 and point

out the differences between the two Acts. Two final points

concerning this chapter: firstly, your reviewer found the

major part of the discussion on the Director of Consumer

Affairs, the Office and staff as being out of place in this

work. Secondly, although the authors refer to the

important case of

Tesco Supermarkets Ltd.

-v-

Nattrass

[1972] A.C. 153 and discuss its facts and explain the

decision, no effort was made to assess the effect of the

case.

Although this is a well-produced book your reviewer

had some misgivings concerning presentation: Page 6: In

their comment on section 3 of the 1980 Act the authors

refer to paragraph (a). They are, of course, referring to

subsection (1) (a) of section 3; Page 19: In the comment on

section 14 of the 1893 Act, as substituted, it is stated that

twenty-three words (which are quoted) do not appear in

the equivalent definition of "merchantable quality" in

section 7 of the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act,

1973 (U.K.). The definition in section 14 has only three

additional words (viz. "and as durable,"); Page 68: In line

9 of the commentary read "section 6 of the 1946 Act" for

"section 6 of the 1949 Act"; Page 106: The effect of

section 4(2) of the 1978 Act is to confine section 2(2) of the

1887 Act, insofar as it relates to trade descriptions, to

sales in the course of trade, business or profession and not

trade, business or manufacture as stated by the authors;

page 125: The authors believe that the requirements of

section 22(2) must be followed in order to rely on any of

the defences in section 22(1). This is not what is stated in

the Act. The requirements of subsection (2) need only be

followed where the defence involves the allegation that

the commission of the offence was due to the act or

default of another person or to reliance on information

supplied by another person. One wonders why the

citations of the Irish Law Times Reports are given

without the years of the Volumes in chapter 3 and with the

years in chapter 2. This is inconsistent and is repeated in

the Table of Cases; The commentaries at the beginning of

each chapter are in ordinary type as are the texts of

sections quoted. In chapter 7 commentary is given at all

times at the beginning of a section or under a heading in

similar ordinary type. This is unfortunate as readers who

wish to use this chapter for quick commentary on the 1978

Act may miss the authors' comments. It would have been

preferable, for this reason, to give the latter comments in

the same small print used for commentaries after sections.

The approach of the authors throughout the book

(with the exception of the chapter on Hire-Purchase and

Letting of Goods) is to refer to analogous provisions of

United Kingdom statutes so as to facilitate reference to

English interpretation and commentaries and to

comment on the differences between the British

definitions and those of the Irish legislation. The

commentary does not, therefore, purport to be exhaustive

and readers will have to be prepared to refer to larger

tomes from the United Kingdom for more detailed

treatment.

This book is, nevertheless, a welcome addition to the

few business law books already available in this juris-

diction. It will be found useful primarily by lawyers in

practice, but also by law students and all concerned with

consumer affairs. We should be especially grateful to the

authors for guiding us through this mass of legislation

and to the Law Society for publishing such an inexpensive

and handy pocket-size reference work.

Hugh M. Fitzpatrick

SUMMONS SERVERS LIMITED

Telephone: 370788

ALL COURT DOCUMENTS SERVED

ANYWHERE IN IRELAND.

AFFIDAVITS PREPARED AND SWORN

Prompt efficient service, at

reasonable rates.

Difficult Cases a Speciality

Worldwide Representation for

Out of Jurisdiction Cases

25, WALNUT RISE, GRIFFITH AVE.,

DUBLIN 9.

A subsidiary of:-

'K* SECURITY (PRIVATE

INVESTIGATIONS) LIMITED.

261