Previous Page  185 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 185 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

Vol. 50

No. 9

MARCH,

1957

THE GAZETTE

of the

INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY OF IRELAND

PruiJtnt

NIALL S. GAFFNEY

Vice-Pruidents

DESMOND J. COLLINS

CHARLES J. DOWNING

Sierilarj

ERIC A. PLUNKETT

FOR CIRCULATION AMONG MEMBERS

MEETINGS OF THE COUNCIL.

FEBRUARY zSrn : The President in the Chair :

Also

present: Messrs. Desmond J. Mayne, Scan O

hUadhaigh, Francis J. Gearty, Cornelius J. Daly,

James R. Quirke, Patrick R. Boyd, Reginald J.

Nolan, Ralph J. Walker, Robert McD. Taylor,

Peter E. O'Connell, Arthur Cox, Francis J. Lanigan,

George A. Nolan, John Carrigan, Dermot P. Shaw,

Terence de Vere White, Henry St. J. Blake, Louis

Walsh, Patrick F. O'Reilly, George G. Overeiid,

W. J. Comerford, John J. Shell, Joseph P. Tyrrell,

John J. Nash, Joseph Barrett, Thomas A. O'Reilly.

The following was among the business transacted :

Letting agreements drawn by auctioneers.

MEMBERS informed the Society that an agreement

for the letting of a furnished flat had been drawn

up by a firm of auctioneers and estate agents. On

a report from a Committee it was decided to write

to the auctioneers concerned drawing their attention

to the provisions of Section 58 of the Solicitors Act

1954 and asking for an undertaking that such agree

ments would not be prepared by the firm in future.

Payment of costs in land bonds.

THE Council considered a report from a Committee

which had obtained the opinion of senior counsel

on the question whether a solicitor acting for an

owner whose lands are compulsorily acquired by

the Land Commission must accept payment of his

costs in land bonds which may stand below market

value. Counsel advised that the owner's solicitor

may elect either to go on the allocation schedule as

a claimant in respect of the solicitor and client costs

or to put the name of the owner on the allocation

schedule as the claimant.

If the solicitor is treated

as the claimant he must accept payment of his

costs in land bonds for the nominal value of the

costs.

In this event the land bonds will be trans

ferred to the solicitor direct. If the owner's solicitor

stays off the allocation schedule the claimant will

be treated as the owner of the bonds which will be

transferred to him direct. The disadvantage of the

latter course is that the solicitor loses the right of

direct access to the land bonds. If the land bonds

are transferred to the client the solicitor will be

entitled to ask the client for payment in cash.

77