Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  429 / 1311 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 429 / 1311 Next Page
Page Background

Steenbakkers et al Radiother Oncol 2005

Determining GTV: CT

Challenges for radiotherapy planning:

Atelectasis

Effusion

Lymph node involvement

Use of lung and soft tissue window side-by-

side

Lung window for lung interfaces

Soft tissue window for mediastinal and hilar interfaces

Bone window if infiltration suspected

Use of MPR display

Lymph nodes remain difficult

Ashamalla et al, IJROBP 2005

Determining GTV: PET/CT

Change of GTV from CT alone in 52%

Increase of concordance among

observers from 37% to 84%

Black: CT, Purple: PET/CT

Grosu et al Strahlenther Onkol 2005

Determining GTV: PET/CT

PET adds essential information to CT

Significant consequences on GTV, CTV and PTV

»

Range 21 -100 % of patients

»

Lymph node involvement

»

Differentiation tumor vs. atelectasis

Shortcoming: Inflammatory disease

Generally recommended for all dose

escalation studies

Lung motion

9.5 ±

4.9

7.2 ±

1.8

4.3 ±

2.4

CC

6.1 ±

3.3

4.3 ±

2.2

2.8 ±

1.3

AP

6.0 ±

2.8

4.3 ±

2.4

3.4 ±

1.6

ML

4.3 ±

2 4

2.8 ±

1.3

AP

Tumor mobility during

shallow breathing [mm]

9.5 ± 4.9

7.2 ± 1.8

4.3 ± 2.4

CC

6.1 ± 3.3

4.3 ± 2.2

2.8 ± 1.3

AP

6.0 ± 2.8

4.3 ± 2.4

3.4 ± 1.6

ML

Lung Tumor Mobility

Plathow et al. 2005

Lung Tumor Mobility after Radiotherapy