![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0135.jpg)
have caused a certain judicialisation of what is more
correctly a political area—but it has helped sustain that
Federal principle of partnership which is being currently
eroded by Bonn. And the Germans, as yet unused to the
idea that in a pluralistic democracy decisions are made
by groups and not by an all-embracing State, should
welcome the presence of such a strong reviewing power
as the Federal Constitutional Court.
T o the Ge rman mind words such as "uniformity" and
"homogeneity" are closely linked with the concept of
government. T h e "single will" idea is not dead in West
Ge rmany even though Ge rmany is supposedly a Federal
and not a unitary State. T h e National Government at
Bonn tends to steamroller opposition from the Lands
somewhat in line with the ingrained Ge rman idea that
a State should not at the same time have two contra-
dictory wills. Diversity in government and politics does
not necessarily mean disunity and the Germans might
do well to remember Harold Laski's comment on
g o v e r nme n t:
We must make consent to disagree the basis of our
State—therein, we shall ensure its deepest harmony.
If West Ge rmany sincerely wishes to retain a genuine
Federation then Bonn must not become too big for its
boots.
Spirit of Constitution undermined
It is somewhat ironical to note that though there is
(as is usual) a provision in the Ge rman Constitution for
altering parts of the Basic Law, those articles of it which
describe basic rights and which declared Ge rmany to be
a Federal and not a unitary State cannot be altered by
any process whatever. T h e theory and the written Con-
stitution may remain the same but the spirit of the
Constitution has been seriously undermined in West
Ge rma ny and that nation's Federal Constitutional
Court stands out as the institution which can revive and
revise a system of government which is today in practice
far f r om Federal.
It is indeed somewhat anomalous to note in the wider
context of the European Economic Community that the
hopes of European Federalists such as Mon et and
Sc huma nn which Conrad Adenauer always encouraged
have not either been fulfilled. It is a factthat in 1957
the Treaties of Rome on the creation of the European
Economic Commun i ty and a European Atomic Auth-
ority were successfully concluded, but in 1974 the
Federal Union of Europe favoured at least in principle
by all the Member States, has not at all advanced in
spite of the phenomenal economic success of that
Community.
Reyners v. Belgium
Th e ie lias been much interest in European legal
circles about this case, on the freedom of professional
establishment, which has recently been referred by the
Belgian Gonseil d'Etat to the European Court under
Art. 177. T h e case concerns a Netherlands national,
but a Doctor of Belgian law, who cannot be called to
the Belgian Bar because reciprocity in the country of
origin is required as a condition for admission to the
Bar under Belgian law. Art. 55 states that the pi
-0
"
visions of the chapter of the Tr e a ty of Rome on righ
1
of establishment shall not apply, so far as any gi
ven
Member State is concerned, to "activities which in tha'
State are connected, even occasionally, with the
exercis
e
of official authority". T h e Belgian Court has asked
an interpretation of the words in quotation. In part''
cular, it has asked whether they are to be interpreted
in such a way that within a profession like that
avocat only activities which are connected with th
e
exercise of official authority are excluded from th
e
application of this chapter of the Treaty, or as meaning
that this profession itself is to be excluded on the
grounds that its exercise involves activities which
are
connected with the exercise of official authority.
Governments of Member States are entitled to sub'
mit observations on references under Art. 177 and it
lS
understood that the U . K. Government, after consults
tion with the profession, has submitted observations
0,1
this case, in which the oral hearing will take place <>
n
7 Ma y.
T h e European Court's ruling on this question ntf)
help to produce a solution
of
the problems
concerning
the freedom of establishment for lawyers within th
e
EEC which will be acceptable in Member States.
Note:
It is understood that the Netherlands Parliament
is currently considering a Bill on the reform
the legal profession, including a clause removing
the nationality requirement for admission to tb
e
Bar, but this may not proceed until the outcom
e
of the Reyners case is known.
SAINT LUKE'S
CANCER RESEARCH
FUND
Gifts or legacies to assist this Fund are most
gratefully received by the Secretary, Liam J-
P. Egan, F.H.A. (E), at "Oakland", Highfield
Road, Rathgar, Dublin 6. Tel. 976491.
This Fund does not employ canvassers or
collectors, and is not associates with any
other body in fund-raising.
134