Previous Page  140 / 300 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 140 / 300 Next Page
Page Background

CORRESPONDENCE

7th May 1974

Private

Mr- R. Ryan, T.D.,

Minister for Finance,

government Buildings,

J/Pper Merrion Street,

Dublin 2.

re Capital

Taxation

D e a

r Mr. Ryan,

I he Incorporated Law Society is deeply concerned

the proposals in the White Paper on capital taxation

hat certain capital taxes should be charged on pro-

y.

. As a practising Solicitor in the past you will appre-

.

Ia

te personally that such a provision in legislation

Jtoplimenting your proposals would create the greatest

'tficulty with regard to administration and would in-

.

ee

d make the completion of sales of property a virtual

^possibility at present.

You will recollect the difficulty in obtaining Certi-

Jteates under Section 6 of the Finance Act 1928 with

^?ard to Schedule "A" Income Tax, until this was

"fished some time ago.

I he amounts then involved were very small and it

as usually possible to deal with the situation by the

"ncitor for the Purchaser retaining a small sum until

e

Section 6 clearance Certificate was available from

.

e

Revenue Commissioners when the sum was re-

ted to the Vendor,

"bt

Section 6 Certificate usually took months to

• ^ he Society urge strongly upon you that you should

"

e

r abandon or at least postpone, until adequate

achinery is available, the provision that any capital

l<

*Xes

„i

1 —

*

Posit;

e s

should be charged on property and permit the

"ion to remain that capital taxes would be the

Income Tax

p(

*sonal liability of the Vendor.

^A decision could always be made to introduce a

aar

Re Clause in later legislation if it was felt necessary,

some experience of operation had been gained,

of V ,

e r e

a t

P

r e s e n t n o

machinery for the furnishing

. Certificates of Discharge by the Revenue Commis-

n

ers and there are already sales which it is not

sible to close as the Purchasers are not prepared to

^

Ce

pt property subject to a possible claim by the

e

venue Commissioners for tax unpaid by the Vendor,

r *he Society regards this separate issue as very urgent

of ^

L

,

P

0

'

n

t of view of the every day administration

toe property market particularly in relation to the

Mhase of private dwelling houses.

y

ours faithfully,

James J. Ivers,

Director-General

HOW THE NEW LEVELS ARE INTENDED

TO OPERATE

fj

a

pital Gains Tax

18

intended to :

' Reduce the rate from 35 p.c. to 26 p.c.

(2) Exempt all gains realised on a principal private

residence standing on grounds of up to one acre.

Annual Wealth Tax

The following changes will be made :

(1) There will be a single rate of 1 p.c. instead of the

rates of

p.c. to 2£ p.c. indicated in the White

Paper.

(2) Exemption thresholds will be increased to £100,000

for a married man and to £70,000 for a single

person, instead of thresholds of £60,000 and

£40,000 in the White Paper. In addition, there will

be an allowance of £2,500 for each minor child

and a new exemption threshold—of £90,000—for

widowed persons.

(3) These thresholds will be revised every three years

to take account of inflation, and such valuations

will remain valid for three years.

(4) Three new exemptions will be introduced—1,

Principal private residence standing on grounds of

up to 1 acre and normal contents; 2, Livestock

and bloodstock, and, 3, Pension rights.

(5) Instead of the test for liability in respect of what

might be called "world property" being domicile or

ordinary residence as proposed in the White Paper,

it is intended to apply a test of domicile and

ordinary residence.

(6) Other aspects of wealth tax to which consideration

is being given include the form of relief appro-

priate for productive capital used in business. Be-

cause of varying needs of industries and businesses

it is not easy to define a suitable code for universal

application.

Further discussions will be held with the interests con-

cerned to identify special problems.

(1) Contemporaneously with the introduction of wealth

tax, the top rate of income tax will be reduced

from 80 p.c. to 70 p.c. and this will apply to tax-

able incomes from £10,350 instead of £8,350, as

at present.

This will be achieved by substituting for the pre-

sent two bands of taxable income at 50 p.c. and

65 p.c., three bands of £2,000 each, chargeable at

rates of 45 p.c., 55 p.c. and 65 p.c. Relief will be

given to all taxpayers at present chargeable to in-

come tax at a rate of 50 p.c. or over.

(2) Despite the modification in the income tax rates,

higher thresholds and lower rate of wealth tax, the

combined rate of income and wealth tax might, in

some cases, still absorb an unacceptably high pro-

portion of total income. Various ways of meeting

this problem are being examined.

Some overall limit might be set on the percentage of

income to be taken by these two taxes, but with the

proviso that any consequential abatement of wealth

taxation would not reduce the Wealth Tax pay-

able below a certain percentage of the assessed

liability.

139