Previous Page  157 / 300 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 157 / 300 Next Page
Page Background

them. The idea of having a special course for book-

keepers is excellent, and should be pursued. The statu-

tory charge of a solicitor at £ 6 per hour is far too

l

o w

—t h is should be revised to at least from £10 to

£12 per hour. Accountants had now abandoned hourly

rates.

Mr. Barry

(Accountant) stated that it was not

known now whether scale charges would be abolished

or not, as the National Prices Commission would

shortly be holding an inquiry into solicitors costs.

The Director-General

stressed that it was intended

to adjust solicitors' costs as soon as possible. However,

in order to succeed, it was paramount that the re-

searches should be well documented, and that at least

50% of the questionnaires should be made available,

otherwise we will not be taken seriously by the Prices

Commission.

Mrs. Maura O'Mahony

stressed that time-costing

would not have much application in conveyancing mat-

ters.

Mr. Liam Mac Hale

(Ballina) said that solicitors

were not equally adept in their professional duties, and

that they would have to take steps to improve. It was

essential to project to the public an image of service

to the community.

Mr. Brendan O'Maoleoin

emphasised that the solici-

tors were not philanthropists, but would seek to make a

profit. He thought that they should charge at least

£15 per hour for their services. The nonsense of

counting folios in the charge of documents would have

to be stopped.

LEGAL AID

Mr. William A. Osborne, Vice-President, took the Chair

on Saturday morning, May 11th, when the Attorney-

General,

Mr. Declan Costello, S.C.,

delivered an address

on "Legal Aid".

The Attorney-General emphasised that the State had

a responsibility to ensure that legal aid, civil and crim-

inal, would be made available as of right to those entitled

to avail of it. It would be a very complex matter to

devise an efficient scheme, therefore it had been decided

to set up an Advisory Committee on Civil Legal Aid,

which was becoming a matter of critical importance; the

members of that Committee under the Chairmanship of

Mr. Justice Pringle, had been announced that morning.

Mr. Costello then referred to the absence of agreed

criteria for the granting of Legal Aid Certificates, and

referred to the duty solicitor scheme in Scotland. In

England, the system of legal aid had developed gradu-

ally. In 1930, Legal Aid was made available for the

defence of poor prisoners; in 1949, prisoners could

obtain legal aid by reason of the gravity of the charge;

in 1962, the criterion became whether it was "desirable

in the interests of justice" rather than "by reason of

the gravity of the charge". The Widgery Committee in

1973 reported that it was desirable in the interest of

justice to have some criteria.

In 1945, the Rushcliffe Committee had reported that

it was desirable to have legal aid, civil and criminal,

available to all deserving cases in all Courts—from

Magistrates' Courts to the House of Lords. Th e scheme

was to be administered by the legal profession, and all

lawyers in the case were to be adequately remunerated.

Under the 1949 Act, the scheme only applied initially

10

the Superior Courts, but it was extended in 1956 to

County Courts. A Legal Advice Scheme was introduce"

in 1959. The 1949 Act was amended in 1960 and 'J

1964. A limited amount of legal aid had been granted

in cases involving Magistrates' Courts in 1965, and th

2

whole Legal Aid Scheme has recently been consolidate

by the Legal Aid Act 1974.

The English Law Society drew up proposals for Advic

e

Centres in 250 localities in England and Wales, b

ut

these were never implemented. The Statutory Advic"

Scheme of 1959 was eventually amended in 1972, an

consequently there is now in England a very flexib'

scheme of legal advice and assistance. A defect in tn

scheme arises from the fact that som edeprived peop'

do not like visiting solicitors' offices in the city centres-

Solicitors in the country should assist in advice centre

5

in populous areas like Ballyfermot or Ballymun, wher

e

whole time solicitors should be employed.

A distinctive feature of the English system is that "

is mainly contributory. Those who can afford to p

3

)

must do so; the scheme is also financed from the cost

5

awarded against opponents of legally assisted person

5

-

The commitment of the British Exchequer is entire')

open-ended, and the State has assumed an absolute

commitment to meet the necessary costs. The total co

5

of the English Legal Aid Scheme in 1973 was

million, to which the State contributed about £}

million, almost two-thirds of the cost. In England it

15

not intended to introduce any upper limits to wh'

c

legal aid is not applicable.

As regards the scope of application of Legal Aid,

extends in England and Wales to all Courts, but not t°

administrative tribunals. Some cases like defamation

3

[

e

excluded from the scheme. The schemes for Legal Aid i"

England and Wales, in Scotland and in Northern I

fe

'

land, are administered by their respective Law Societies

There is a total staff of 1,400 employed, of which on')

100 are qualified solicitors.

The Irish Criminal Justice (Legal Aid) Act 1962 haj

extended the right to apply for legal aid in restrict"

criminal cases only, but it had now been recognized th

3

'

citizens had a right to apply for legal aid in civil cas"

5

-

Mr. Gerard Doyle,

in proposing the vote of thanks

t0

the Attorney-General, emphasised that Legal Aid h

3

now become a civic duty. On account of the low scale-

of remuneration provided by the 1965 Legal Aid

Order

based on the 1962 Act, many solicitors had had

alternative but to opt out of the scheme. It was remark

able that Legal Aid had existed in some form in th

e

United States since 1866, and it was paramount th

3

]

any scheme of Legal Aid devised should be controlled

by the Law Society.

Mr. P. C. Moore

stated that the concept of "co

5

'-

following the event" was old fashioned, and would n

ot

be practical if a scheme of legal aid were to be intr

0

'

duced.

Mr. T. C. G. O'Mahony

stated it was unfortunat

f

that the concept of charity in Legal Aid would ^

bolished as he feared that the concepts of human'

1

)

and sympathy would tend to be lost.

Mr. Rory O'Connor,

in seconding the vote of thank

5

'

commended the activities of the Free Legal Aid Comm'

1

'

tees (FLAC).

156