![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0201.jpg)
On being asked whether this provision produced
direct effects which could be invoked in national pro-
ceedings, the Court held that the terms of Article 92 (1),
which contained the declaration of incompatibility,
were intended to take effect in the legal systems of
Member States only when they had been put in concrete
form by acts having general application of the Commis-
sion or Council, as provided for in subsequent articles
of the Treaty.
Here, in contrast to the foregoing examples, was a
situation where the incompatibility of the aids with the
Common Market depended on an elaborate assessment
of the many conditions and exemptions mentioned in
Article 92. Moreover, it is only after reading the whole
of the section on aids that it becomes clear that it is
for the Commission or Council to adopt legislation or
make decisions providing for the abolition or the sup-
pression of such aid schemes and the laying down the
time table for such action.
That is to say we have an example of a Treaty pro-
vision where the interdiction was not of itself suffi-
ciently precise and where its operation required the
intervention of a Community institution.
The situation, of course, may be very different if there
has been intervention by, say, the Commission. It would
then be for the national Judge to read the relevant
regulation together with the Treaty in order to decide
whether there was a prohibition sufficiently precise for
him to see whether or not there had been non-
compliance.
[to be continued]
Creating a Common Market for Companies
Part II
By DR. IVO E. SCHWARTZ, LL.M.
Part II of a lecture delivered by Dr. Schwartz, who is Director for Approximation
of Laws: Companies
and
Firms, Public Contracts,
Intellectual
Property, Fair Competition, General Matters, Commission of the Euro-
pean Communities,
Brussels. The lecture was given in Wexford on
9 March 1974.
Continued from
July-August
"Gazette
" pp. 178-181.
A truly European industry must depend on a Euro-
pean capital market, and funds will only be tempted
across national boundaries on a larger scale if the
methods of presentation of the financial state and per-
formance of companies are more strictly comparable.
Thus the demand for European methods of accounting
is a strong one. In a common market with characteristics
similar to those existing in a national market it is also
nccessary to establish throughout the Community equi-
valent legal requirements as regards the extent of the
financial information that should be made available to
the public by companies that are in competition with
one another and have the same legal form.
Moreover, insufficient disclosure requirements in some
of the Member States do not favour rationalisation and
will not strengthen the competitiveness of the com-
panies concerned in those countries.
The Fourth Directive
Thus the Fourth Company Directive regarding the
annual accounts of limited liability companies is of
considerable importance. The proposal dates from 1971
but has been amended in February 1974 to take into
account the situation in the new Member States and
the opinions delivered by the European Parliament and
the Economic and Social Committee which highly
welcomed the Commission's proposal.
The main changes include a clear statement that
accounts shall give "a true and fair view" of the com-
pany's assets, liabilities, financial position and results—
a principle on which British and Irish accountants had
strongly insisted.
It implies that limited companies would be legally
obliged to provide additional information, over and
above the minimum laid down in the Directive, if the
figures provided did not amount to a "true and fair
view".
Greater flexibility would also now be allowed in the
lay-out of accounts. Additions have been made to the
general principles of valuation listed in the Directive,
so as to take account of current practice in the United
Kingdom and Eire. The amended version also offers a
much-wider scope for using new valuation methods,
such as those allowing for the effects of inflation.
Following the British example, the Commission also
wants now information on net turnover to be accom-
panied by an indication of the contribution of the
company's different commercial and industrial activities
to the turnover and to the year's results.
The amended Directive is thus largely an amalgam of
both continental and British and Irish best accounting
practices.
However, it maintains the earlier Directive's insis-
tence on a strictly schematised presentation of accounts,
as against the flexible current British and Irish approach.
It remains to be seen when the Council's heavily
charged groups of government representatives will find
time to start the discussion of the Commission's pro-
posal.
The 31st of December 1975 has been fixed by the
Council as deadline for the adoption of the Directive.
When a company belongs to a group, only the pre-
sentation of consolidated accounts can give a true and
fair, as well as a complete view of the situation of the
companies concerned. Therefore the Commission has
committed itself to submit a proposal for a Directive on
consolidated accounts of groups of companies not later
than next year. At the same time, we are working on
199