Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  323 / 975 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 323 / 975 Next Page
Page Background

Table 1: Expected Functionality of Independent Protection Layers

Layer of Protection Expected Functionality

BPCS:

Keeping the process under control

Alarms:

Alerting the operator of abnormal conditions

and providing guidelines for appropriate

operator response

SIS:

Automatically taking the process to a safe

condition in case the abnormal condition

goes out of control and the operators can’t

take any corrective action in time

Other layers:

Intended to mitigate the consequence of the

hazard

The concept of Independent protection layers (IPL) can also be illustrated in Figure 1

3. Common Cause Failures

The idea of functional independent systems is an attempt to avoid Common Cause Failures (CCF).

Common Cause Failures [3] are failures that might affect more than one of these protection layers at the same

time. As engineers, the tendency will be to focus on elements such as Heat, Humidity, Shock, and radio

interference among others. However this paper also considers, with special interest, the human elements

related to the design of safety critical systems which can contribute to additional failures.

As with other systems, some SIS problems are related to the Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) products

designed for a specific function (i.e. hardware limitations or poor documentation) while other problems are

related to the use of those COTS product such as misapplication, user application programming or poor

maintenance practices. Both areas can be addressed by implementing appropriate design best practices to

reduce risk.