Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  88-89 / 975 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 88-89 / 975 Next Page
Page Background

Hybrid applications of IEC61511 – Laurie Blackmore

Disadvantages include:

§

SIS is as big or even bigger than the non-61511 (API) design leading to increased

complexity of operation, maintenance. This increases the risk of systematic faults - the

primary cause of major incidents

§

Testing frequency is still based on API RP14C (3 months transmitters, 1 year SDV‘s)

rather than (longer) IEC61511 intervals. This reduces ability to focus on the high-risk

functions.

§

The engineering cost and potential schedule increase associated with IEC61511 is

incurred without the benefit of equipment rationalisation or reduced testing costs

Lifecycle/contract issues:

§

Make sure it is clear in the contract if IEC61511 applies to only safety or includes asset

etc

§

Only apply 61511 lifecycle requirements for stages after SIL assessment for safety

SIF‘s at SIL 1 or above? (Clarify in the contract since it has an impact on engineering

hours and potentially equipment)

11

Full lifecycle implementation but with retention of all API protection